Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Txsleuth

in my opinion, the biggest risk to Libby is if Fitzgerald can show he destroyed his notes (or otherwise had easy access to them but did not provide them), Fitzgerald was able to obtain and authenticate those notes from an independent source (someone made a copy, an attachement on a saved email), and Libby testified to the contrary and can't get by with simply saying "I forgot about that meeting".


295 posted on 11/07/2005 5:30:46 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies ]


To: oceanview

Yes....you do have a good point.

President Bush said he wanted all to cooperate fully, and tell the truth...so, for Libby's sake, I hope he did tell the truth, but something else went haywire.

However, when it was Libby that they were "going after"...he seemed like a big target to the dems...but, now that he is the "only one" that Fitzy has indicted..do you notice how fast Chrissy Matthews has changed his tune....

and the dems have changed theirs, to pre-war intelligence again??? LOL


296 posted on 11/07/2005 5:34:56 PM PST by Txsleuth (I am the real TXSLEUTH...please freepmail me if you doubt it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson