Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: conservative in nyc
"..It gets better. By sharing his sign-on information, WBAL reported, MD4Bush might have violated the website user policy that he agreed to, thereby voiding his right to confidentiality.

Free Republic is showing signs that they’re ready to go public with the name, and it doesn’t look good for the state Democratic party.."

There really is no might to it. MD4Bush did violate the User agreement.

Registration and User Agreement

"User Account Confidentiality: User agrees to protect user's account and password and not to disclose account information to any third party."

What's more the Washington post did as well when they logged in under his name and this might get a lot more serious than mere embarrasment.

Unlawful Access to Stored Communications 18 U.S.C. 2701.

"§ 2701. Unlawful Access to Stored Communications

(a) Offense.--Except as provided in subsection (c) of this section whoever–

(1) intentionally accesses without authorization a facility through which an electronic communication service is provided; or

(2) intentionally exceeds an authorization to access that facility; and thereby obtains, alters, or prevents authorized access to a wire or electronic communication while it is in electronic storage in such system shall be punished as provided in subsection (b) of this section. "

The WP did exceed an authorization to access FR by using anothers password(Forbidden under the Users Agreement which govern the access of users) to access FRmails and did not make any attempt to determine the rules of access to FR or presumably they would not have improperly used anothers password. They flat did violate section 2b of 18 U.S.C. 2701 in that they did not view, or observe the rules if they did view them. If the reporter was unaware of 2b of 18 U.S.C. 2701 it won't help. A professional at a large newspaper should know or should have asked.

18 posted on 11/08/2005 9:16:20 AM PST by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Anti-Bubba182
We haven't even started much on the WaPo's ethical problems with using anonymous sources in violation of their own policies for using anonymous sources. Like giving the reader enough information about the source to figure out if the source is holding a grudge.
19 posted on 11/08/2005 9:21:39 AM PST by conservative in nyc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson