Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Math problems too big for our brains
Ottawa Citizen via The Windsor Star ^ | November 8 2005

Posted on 11/08/2005 8:48:52 AM PST by RightWingAtheist

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-177 next last
To: MineralMan

Try looking up "factorial bases". There's a mind-blower.


101 posted on 11/08/2005 10:49:52 AM PST by ctdonath2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: RightWingAtheist

2 + 2 = 5, for very big 2.


102 posted on 11/08/2005 10:55:55 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (NY Times headline: Protocols of the Learned Elders of CBS, Fake but Accurate, Experts Say)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWingAtheist

Sir Francis Bacon died as a lonely and severely disappointed man.


103 posted on 11/08/2005 10:56:37 AM PST by Old Professer (Fix the problem, not the blame!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2

"Try looking up "factorial bases". There's a mind-blower."




Now, that makes my brain hurt.

I mentioned earlier the Sumerian/Babylonian Base 60 system. We still preserve that system in our hours and minutes.

One article pointed out that Base 30 is a natural counting system, using the joints of the fingers (base of thumb counts as a joint) as counters. I immediately thought of how you could display all 30 numbers by hand position. Fascinating.

Our calendar and our time measurement system comes from Base 12 math, which can also be derived from Base 60, and probably was.

Then we have the 360 degrees of the circle, also compatible with base 60.

Longitude and Lattitude are also expressed in 60 increments.

Apparently the Mayans used Base 20 in their math.

Numbers are amazing.


104 posted on 11/08/2005 10:57:59 AM PST by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: RightWingAtheist
No human can ever understand all of it, either.

When I discovered that pie are not square and corn bread was, I realized that I didn't have the capability for math.

105 posted on 11/08/2005 11:00:54 AM PST by scouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWingAtheist

bump


106 posted on 11/08/2005 11:13:45 AM PST by Centurion2000 ((Aubrey, Tx) --- America, we get the best government corporations can buy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boojumsnark

Is the set of all sets that are not subsets of themselves a subset of itself?


107 posted on 11/08/2005 11:27:09 AM PST by Freedom_Fighter_2001 (When money is no object - it's your money they're talking about)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Professional Engineer

Sorry, this is only defined over the range 18-49 years. After this time, n approaches nny geometrically.


108 posted on 11/08/2005 11:30:59 AM PST by Freedom_Fighter_2001 (When money is no object - it's your money they're talking about)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: tutstar

bump for later...


109 posted on 11/08/2005 11:41:14 AM PST by tutstar (OurFlorida.true.ws)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWingAtheist
you can prove two plus two equals four, always and everywhere.

Are you sure? How accurately can you measure zero, or two, or four? Two plus two may be 3.99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 because one two was actually 1.99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999; or was it the other 2.

110 posted on 11/08/2005 11:48:06 AM PST by MosesKnows
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
And there ya go, except for one small detail. One of the fingers has to represent zero in Base 8. That's a problem if you count on your fingers.

But that's why God gave us belly buttons.

111 posted on 11/08/2005 1:45:18 PM PST by Erasmus (Getting captivated by modern music leads to Stockhausen Syndrome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Erasmus

"But that's why God gave us belly buttons."

Gosh, and here I though I got mine from my mom. I'm pretty sure an umbilical cord was involved.

Question: Did Adam have a navel?


112 posted on 11/08/2005 1:46:31 PM PST by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Faraday
Apparently the reporter has never heard of Godel's Incompleteness Theorem. To wit: "In any axiomatic mathematical system there are propositions that cannot be proved or disproved within the axioms of the system."

Slight edit: "In any axiomatic mathematical system there are propositions which are true but which cannot be proved or disproved within the axioms of the system."

113 posted on 11/08/2005 1:47:40 PM PST by Erasmus (Getting captivated by modern music leads to Stockhausen Syndrome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
Really? I can prove that 2 + 2 = 11.

Yes and I can prove that 1+1 = 10.

114 posted on 11/08/2005 1:50:56 PM PST by tophat9000 ("Space for rent")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: tophat9000

"Yes and I can prove that 1+1 = 10."

2+2=10, too.


115 posted on 11/08/2005 1:56:11 PM PST by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: MortMan
There are 10 kinds of people in this world. Those that understand binary math, and those that don't! ;-P

That jokes so old, what are you, F?

116 posted on 11/08/2005 1:56:25 PM PST by tophat9000 ("Space for rent")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
Question: Did Adam have a navel?

No.

Question: How does an asexually reproducing organism produce offspring that reproduces sexually? :)

117 posted on 11/08/2005 1:58:51 PM PST by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: RightWingAtheist

118 posted on 11/08/2005 2:02:10 PM PST by TX Bluebonnet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
Question: How does an asexually reproducing organism produce offspring that reproduces sexually? :)

Oddly that question is valid for both creationists and evolutionists in that both contend an asexually start

119 posted on 11/08/2005 2:10:33 PM PST by tophat9000 ("Space for rent")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: RightWingAtheist
42...

I wonder how many people have already posted this answer...

BTW, this really IS the correct answer to the question... Try plugging this into your c compiler:

#include
#define SIX 1 + 5
#define NINE 8 + 1

int main(void)

{
printf( "What do you get if you multiply %d by %d? %d\n", SIX, NINE, SIX * NINE );
return 0;
}

Mark

120 posted on 11/08/2005 2:17:07 PM PST by MarkL (I didn't get to where I am today by worrying about what I'd feel like tomorrow!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-177 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson