Skip to comments.
Math problems too big for our brains
Ottawa Citizen via The Windsor Star ^
| November 8 2005
Posted on 11/08/2005 8:48:52 AM PST by RightWingAtheist
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 161-177 next last
To: MineralMan
Try looking up "factorial bases". There's a mind-blower.
To: RightWingAtheist
2 + 2 = 5, for very big 2.
102
posted on
11/08/2005 10:55:55 AM PST
by
Lonesome in Massachussets
(NY Times headline: Protocols of the Learned Elders of CBS, Fake but Accurate, Experts Say)
To: RightWingAtheist
Sir Francis Bacon died as a lonely and severely disappointed man.
103
posted on
11/08/2005 10:56:37 AM PST
by
Old Professer
(Fix the problem, not the blame!)
To: ctdonath2
"Try looking up "factorial bases". There's a mind-blower."
Now, that makes my brain hurt.
I mentioned earlier the Sumerian/Babylonian Base 60 system. We still preserve that system in our hours and minutes.
One article pointed out that Base 30 is a natural counting system, using the joints of the fingers (base of thumb counts as a joint) as counters. I immediately thought of how you could display all 30 numbers by hand position. Fascinating.
Our calendar and our time measurement system comes from Base 12 math, which can also be derived from Base 60, and probably was.
Then we have the 360 degrees of the circle, also compatible with base 60.
Longitude and Lattitude are also expressed in 60 increments.
Apparently the Mayans used Base 20 in their math.
Numbers are amazing.
104
posted on
11/08/2005 10:57:59 AM PST
by
MineralMan
(godless atheist)
To: RightWingAtheist
No human can ever understand all of it, either.When I discovered that pie are not square and corn bread was, I realized that I didn't have the capability for math.
105
posted on
11/08/2005 11:00:54 AM PST
by
scouse
To: RightWingAtheist
106
posted on
11/08/2005 11:13:45 AM PST
by
Centurion2000
((Aubrey, Tx) --- America, we get the best government corporations can buy.)
To: boojumsnark
Is the set of all sets that are not subsets of themselves a subset of itself?
107
posted on
11/08/2005 11:27:09 AM PST
by
Freedom_Fighter_2001
(When money is no object - it's your money they're talking about)
To: Professional Engineer
Sorry, this is only defined over the range 18-49 years. After this time, n approaches nny geometrically.
108
posted on
11/08/2005 11:30:59 AM PST
by
Freedom_Fighter_2001
(When money is no object - it's your money they're talking about)
To: tutstar
109
posted on
11/08/2005 11:41:14 AM PST
by
tutstar
(OurFlorida.true.ws)
To: RightWingAtheist
you can prove two plus two equals four, always and everywhere. Are you sure? How accurately can you measure zero, or two, or four? Two plus two may be 3.99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 because one two was actually 1.99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999; or was it the other 2.
To: MineralMan
And there ya go, except for one small detail. One of the fingers has to represent zero in Base 8. That's a problem if you count on your fingers. But that's why God gave us belly buttons.
111
posted on
11/08/2005 1:45:18 PM PST
by
Erasmus
(Getting captivated by modern music leads to Stockhausen Syndrome.)
To: Erasmus
"But that's why God gave us belly buttons."
Gosh, and here I though I got mine from my mom. I'm pretty sure an umbilical cord was involved.
Question: Did Adam have a navel?
112
posted on
11/08/2005 1:46:31 PM PST
by
MineralMan
(godless atheist)
To: Faraday
Apparently the reporter has never heard of Godel's Incompleteness Theorem. To wit: "In any axiomatic mathematical system there are propositions that cannot be proved or disproved within the axioms of the system." Slight edit: "In any axiomatic mathematical system there are propositions which are true but which cannot be proved or disproved within the axioms of the system."
113
posted on
11/08/2005 1:47:40 PM PST
by
Erasmus
(Getting captivated by modern music leads to Stockhausen Syndrome.)
To: MineralMan
Really? I can prove that 2 + 2 = 11. Yes and I can prove that 1+1 = 10.
114
posted on
11/08/2005 1:50:56 PM PST
by
tophat9000
("Space for rent")
To: tophat9000
"Yes and I can prove that 1+1 = 10."
2+2=10, too.
115
posted on
11/08/2005 1:56:11 PM PST
by
MineralMan
(godless atheist)
To: MortMan
There are 10 kinds of people in this world. Those that understand binary math, and those that don't! ;-PThat jokes so old, what are you, F?
116
posted on
11/08/2005 1:56:25 PM PST
by
tophat9000
("Space for rent")
To: MineralMan
Question: Did Adam have a navel? No.
Question: How does an asexually reproducing organism produce offspring that reproduces sexually? :)
117
posted on
11/08/2005 1:58:51 PM PST
by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: RightWingAtheist
To: ShadowAce
Question: How does an asexually reproducing organism produce offspring that reproduces sexually? :) Oddly that question is valid for both creationists and evolutionists in that both contend an asexually start
119
posted on
11/08/2005 2:10:33 PM PST
by
tophat9000
("Space for rent")
To: RightWingAtheist
42...
I wonder how many people have already posted this answer...
BTW, this really IS the correct answer to the question... Try plugging this into your c compiler:
#include
#define SIX 1 + 5
#define NINE 8 + 1
int main(void)
{
printf( "What do you get if you multiply %d by %d? %d\n", SIX, NINE, SIX * NINE );
return 0;
}
Mark
120
posted on
11/08/2005 2:17:07 PM PST
by
MarkL
(I didn't get to where I am today by worrying about what I'd feel like tomorrow!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 161-177 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson