Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Zeppo

Now that we apparently know that there was no "there" there, I'm wondering why Miller's lawyers don't seek some kind of sanction on Fitzgerald for falsely claiming that Miller was obstructing justice (and holding her in jail for contempt). If there was no underlying 'foul' of outing a covert agent or illegally transmitting classified information (on ship movements, for example), then it would seem to be a mighty weak basis for jailing Miller in order to find out whether or not Libby was being truthful on questions that were only tangentially related to the original mandate of the prosecutor.


25 posted on 11/10/2005 7:59:13 AM PST by Zeppo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Zeppo

she didn't go to jail for Libby - he had already released her, his 2nd release was meaningless.


31 posted on 11/10/2005 6:55:08 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson