Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: andie74
I guess they feel if the recruiters just stand around, nobody will notice them and decide to enlist. They are supporting welfare initiatives by depriving young people of an option that will keep them from failing to plan their lives. What's worse...die a hero for your country, or be a homeless, unemployed bum in San Francisco? Oh, I forgot...there are no bums in the city...they are just homeless....I think my therapist needs a hug!!!
7 posted on 11/09/2005 11:16:13 PM PST by Liberate California ("Live Free or Die"" New Hampshire State Motto and "Silly Liberal, Paychecks are for Workers")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Liberate California

Hey man! No fair picking on the homeless because you've won life's lottery! ; )

Gee, or maybe not die and actually get somewhere in life. Not everyone in military service dies...though that is what these idiots want you to believe.


11 posted on 11/09/2005 11:20:22 PM PST by andie74 (A charter member of "Italians for Alito")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Liberate California

an excerpt:
Middle class filling up military, study says

By Rowan Scarborough
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
November 8, 2005

Middle-class youths, not the poor, are providing the bulk of wartime recruits to the armed forces, according to a new study by a conservative think tank.
The Heritage Foundation research paper found that a higher percentage of middle-class and upper-middle-class families have been providing enlistees for the war on Islamic militants since the September 11 attacks on the United States.
Researchers matched the ZIP codes of recruits over the past five years with federal government estimates of household incomes in those neighborhoods. Contrary to complaints from some liberal lawmakers and pundits, the data show that the poor are not shouldering the bulk of the military's need for new soldiers, airmen, sailors and Marines.
The poorest neighborhoods provided 18 percent of recruits in prewar 1999 and 14.6 percent in 2003. By contrast, areas where household incomes ranged from $30,000 to $200,000 provided more than 85 percent.
"We found that recruits tend to come from middle-class areas, with disproportionately fewer from low-income areas," said the report, prepared by Tim Kane, an Air Force Academy graduate and economics scholar. "Overall, the income distribution of military enlistees is more similar to than different from the income distribution of the general population."
http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20051107-113124-8563r.htm','news',700,400,'TR',0,5,0,'resizable=yes,scrollbars')


27 posted on 11/09/2005 11:55:55 PM PST by tarawa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson