Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Intelligent Design a Bad Scientific Theory or a Non-Scientific Theory?
Tech Central Station ^ | 11/10/2005 | Uriah Kriegel

Posted on 11/10/2005 4:43:24 AM PST by Nicholas Conradin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 861-863 next last
To: Thatcherite
Why do we never find any ancient chimps or humans? Just these skulls that look a bit different from either...

Because there were no modern chimps or modern humans until the last million or so years. Nor are there woolly mammoths or saber-toothed cats today. Modern life forms evolved from earlier life forms.

321 posted on 11/10/2005 4:49:22 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

I have a problem with those who profess to be Christians, yet they publicly profess to disbelieve the Word of God and call God a liar.

Still waiting on your comments on Exodus 21.

322 posted on 11/10/2005 4:49:49 PM PST by ml1954 (NOT the disruptive troll seen frequently on CREVO threads)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 314 | View Replies]

To: ml1954
Is Exodus Chapter 21 God's honest truth?

Why wouldn't it be?

Jesus put his stamp of approval on the Law, did he not?

Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill. For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. (Matthew 5:17-18 KJV)

323 posted on 11/10/2005 4:50:17 PM PST by P-Marlowe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies]

To: Gumlegs; Doc Savage

Who is DS? Who is any of us? Still, it's running about 30 to one, but I'm not going back thru all the posts.


324 posted on 11/10/2005 4:52:13 PM PST by zeeba neighba (no crocs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 318 | View Replies]

To: All; SalukiLawyer; oblomov

This link re: Fossils supports Intelligent Design

http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/filesDB-download.php?id=119


325 posted on 11/10/2005 4:52:21 PM PST by Sun (Hillary Clinton is pro-ILLEGAL immigration. Don't let her fool you. She has a D- /F immigr. rating.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: zeeba neighba
Well, one would think that, if God is the only thing keeping people good, the prisons would be full of atheists. However, it appears that only 0.209 percent of that population is atheist, while 74 percent are Christians of one stripe or another.

Go figure.

326 posted on 11/10/2005 4:52:54 PM PST by Junior (From now on, I'll stick to science, and leave the hunting alien mutants to the experts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

Why wouldn't it be?

So you believe this is the word of God?

Exodus 21:20-21: "If a man beats his male or female slave with a rod and the slave dies as a direct result, he must be punished, but he is not to be punished if the slave gets up after a day or two, since the slave is his property"

327 posted on 11/10/2005 4:53:18 PM PST by ml1954 (NOT the disruptive troll seen frequently on CREVO threads)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

They found one on a dump just the other day. I think they find the "missing link" several times a year.


328 posted on 11/10/2005 4:53:25 PM PST by zeeba neighba (no crocs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies]

To: zeeba neighba

My point was the nature of Doc Savage's post.


329 posted on 11/10/2005 4:55:18 PM PST by Gumlegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 324 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyM

"once again, this whole conversation has been in regard to Ichy's post on classifying hominid skulls and obviously there is difficulty in doing so, or there would be no issue. We are not talking about modern chimps and humans."

Well if those aren't modern human skulls in Ichy's post, then they must have evolved into modern humans, huh?

"To somehow say those skulls were ape,human, or somewhere in between is probably not possible given only the skull and no supporting skeleton or other info."

Argument from personal incredulity. Your personal rejection of the knowledge and expertise of others who can, in fact, make such determinations is not in of itself an argument that discredits that knowledge.


330 posted on 11/10/2005 4:56:17 PM PST by Sofa King (A wise man uses compromise as an alternative to defeat. A fool uses it as an alternative to victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: Junior

I'm sure those 90+ of those "Christians" take drugs, have no respect for the law, God's or the State's, have tattoos and other mangled barbarian features, and care mostly about themselves. They are pagans.


331 posted on 11/10/2005 4:56:36 PM PST by zeeba neighba (no crocs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies]

To: Sun
This link re: Fossils supports Intelligent Design

Does they?

332 posted on 11/10/2005 4:56:52 PM PST by Gumlegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 325 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
Obviously you are not a believer ...

Not obviously. I chat with the Almighty daily. I would be an atheist except for the fact that He chats back (yes, I know I'm probably as loony as they come, but I'm pretty much harmless). I'm far too much of a rationalist, though, to just accept anything without investigation, which is why I no longer accept the Bible as inerrant. If God had any hand in its creation, its long been overwritten by later editors and redactors.

333 posted on 11/10/2005 4:58:04 PM PST by Junior (From now on, I'll stick to science, and leave the hunting alien mutants to the experts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 314 | View Replies]

To: Junior

Fascinating. What did He say today?


334 posted on 11/10/2005 4:59:00 PM PST by zeeba neighba (no crocs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 333 | View Replies]

To: zeeba neighba
Welcome aboard.

Wolf
335 posted on 11/10/2005 5:00:13 PM PST by RunningWolf (tag line limbo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies]

To: ml1954; Junior; MindBender26; blue-duncan; xzins
So you believe this is the word of God?

You don't?

From Albert Barnes commentary:

Exo 21:20-21 - The Jewish authorities appear to be right in referring this law, like those in Exo_21:26-27, Exo_21:32, to foreign slaves (see Lev_25:44-46). The protection here afforded to the life of a slave may seem to us but a slight one; but it is the very earliest trace of such protection in legislation, and it stands in strong and favorable contrast with the old laws of Greece, Rome, and other nations. If the slave survived the castigation a day or two, the master did not become amenable to the law, because the loss of the slave was accounted, under the circumstances, as a punishment.

Are you a Christian?

Or should I say, do you claim to be a Christian?

336 posted on 11/10/2005 5:00:51 PM PST by P-Marlowe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies]

To: RunningWolf

Thanks, however I done fell off the turnip wagon.


337 posted on 11/10/2005 5:00:57 PM PST by zeeba neighba (no crocs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 335 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

It's a sad fact, we know from Josephus for one, that Jews kept slaves. However, Christians in the US and Britain ended it the best they could, and can, in modern times.


338 posted on 11/10/2005 5:03:48 PM PST by zeeba neighba (no crocs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 336 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

From Albert Barnes commentary:

You are dodging. I'm not interested in commentary. Is this the word of God?

Exodus 21:20-21: "If a man beats his male or female slave with a rod and the slave dies as a direct result, he must be punished, but he is not to be punished if the slave gets up after a day or two, since the slave is his property"

339 posted on 11/10/2005 5:04:09 PM PST by ml1954 (NOT the disruptive troll seen frequently on CREVO threads)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 336 | View Replies]

To: Gumlegs

"Does they?"

Yep.


340 posted on 11/10/2005 5:04:21 PM PST by Sun (Hillary Clinton is pro-ILLEGAL immigration. Don't let her fool you. She has a D- /F immigr. rating.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 332 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 861-863 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson