To: js1138
Someone has pointed out to me that Galileo did not have the technology to make precise measurements of gravitational acceleration. There is no doubt that he made measurements. I think he used an inclined plane to make round things "fall" slower, and he measured the time with his pulse. Not terribly precise, but it was sufficient to observe that heavy objects fall no faster than light ones.
159 posted on
11/10/2005 11:34:27 AM PST by
PatrickHenry
(Expect no response if you're a troll, lunatic, retard, or incurable ignoramus.)
To: PatrickHenry
I think he used an inclined plane to make round things "fall" slower, and he measured the time with his pulse.
I remember doing this in a high school physics class.
161 posted on
11/10/2005 11:37:23 AM PST by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: PatrickHenry
But not accurate enough to establish the rate of acceleration with any precision.
My point is that Galileo used direct observation of falling objects. Newton used induction and inference.
162 posted on
11/10/2005 11:39:04 AM PST by
js1138
(Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson