Replies

You said nothing, as you always do. As in this post.

Then you must be habitually sparring with nothing. That is pretty much a definition of insanity. Whatever you think, my statement was still pointing out your mischaracterization of the statement.

Here is another example of your gems

There is no proof for this statement: there exists.

One cannot prove what doesn't exist - only what does exist.

Does your petard fit nicely?

Then you must be habitually sparring with nothing.

Yes, precisely. You say nothing and pretend that it actually has meaning, and I point out it doesn't.

Or were you referring to yourself?

There is no proof for this statement: there exists.

Actually, I never said any such thing. You dropped the context and put in words that I never said. What I quoted was:

"There exists at least one biological structure or process that cannot be explained by natural selection".

The construction that "there exists a structure or process that cannot be explained . . ." is a non-sequitur. To say "there exists" something that "cannot" be explained is simply irrational.