Sounds like I'm confused too in what I thought. I think relativity is one of those things that should probably be left to professionals. I just remembered another successful prediction; don't the clocks on the shuttle run slow enough for the difference to be detectable by the time it lands after a long flight? I'm sure I read it somewhere (so it must be true). I think it was in Relativities Chapter 3 Verses 4-6.
Correct.
It's another prediction of SR; time slows down the faster you go. It wasn't testable until the advent of atomic clocks and jet airplanes to provide the combination of precision and speed needed to measure the effect.
In any case, it's worth noting that despite the anti-Evos being all over this thread for more than 60 posts, it was the Evo's who first noticed and pointed out the errors. Thankfully, the historical errors are not relevant to his analysis and conclusions regarding Popper's falsification principle and it's application to ID "theory." In that regard, he is entirely correct: ID is not scientific.