Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Government Ponders Quantum Computer Regulation
Yahoo ^ | 11/10/05 | Elizabeth Millard

Posted on 11/10/2005 8:07:52 PM PST by Straight Vermonter

A federal advisory committee met Wednesday for a presentation set up by IBM (NYSE: IBM - news) about quantum computers, to determine when the technology might be ready to be considered for government regulation.

The computers, which are still in the early prototype stage, make use of quantum mechanical phenomena to perform operations. It is believed that if large-scale quantum computers could be built, they could solve some problems faster than any existing computer.

In his presentation to the committee, IBM researcher David DiVincenzo compared the potential of quantum computing to the possibilities generated in 1947 when transistors were invented.

Regulation Station

In considering what type of regulations should be imposed on quantum computing, it is likely that the committee mainly will consider how to handle the export status of the machines.

During the 1990s, the U.S. government put strict controls on the export of technology, but has relaxed its stance somewhat due to the growing global economy. However, high-performance computers have been under export control since 2003.

The government has yet to decide how it will treat quantum computers, but the committee's meeting could be an indication that regulators will view the technology in the same way as high-performance computers, and put controls on its export.

Science Department

Despite the regulatory tangles it might present, the advancement of computing is important for several reasons, said Thomas Zacharia, associate laboratory director for Computing and Computational Sciences at the Department of Energy's Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

"Having more power gives researchers the ability to change how science is done," he said. "It makes them think in new ways, and embark on projects that might have seemed impossible only a few years ago."

Although he did not comment on the promise of quantum computing specifically, Zacharia observed that greater processing speed, in general, has allowed researchers and scientists to explore a range of applications, and that the power has been felt across several disciplines.

"Processing power can assist projects in a huge number of fields," he said. "And the continuing advances are very exciting."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

1 posted on 11/10/2005 8:07:53 PM PST by Straight Vermonter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter
In his presentation to the committee, IBM researcher David DiVincenzo compared the potential of quantum computing to the possibilities generated in 1947 when transistors were invented.

I think they meant when transistors were reverse engineered from the Roswell crash.

2 posted on 11/10/2005 8:10:32 PM PST by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter
During the 1990s, the U.S. government put strict controls on the export of technology

Unless you were a big contributer to the Clinton administration.

3 posted on 11/10/2005 8:13:47 PM PST by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: operation clinton cleanup

How long do you think they will have to wait to reveal the quantum computational capabilities they also gleaned from the Roswell crash so as to not make it seem too suspicious?


4 posted on 11/10/2005 8:14:00 PM PST by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: operation clinton cleanup

Yours is the funniest post I have seen in at least a year.


5 posted on 11/10/2005 8:15:41 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear
How long do you think they will have to wait to reveal the quantum computational capabilities they also gleaned from the Roswell crash so as to not make it seem too suspicious?

Depends on if IBM gets exclusive patents, otherwise they may let the cat out of the bag....

6 posted on 11/10/2005 8:16:04 PM PST by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
Yours is the funniest post I have seen in at least a year.

I hope you mean funny "HaHa" and not funny strange!

7 posted on 11/10/2005 8:17:38 PM PST by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter
ready to be considered for government regulation.

In considering what type of regulations should be imposed on quantum computing

*Shiver*

8 posted on 11/10/2005 8:18:46 PM PST by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: operation clinton cleanup

I mean I read your post and laughed real hard and even shared it with my family.


9 posted on 11/10/2005 8:22:18 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter

I've got a quantum computer now. All the cables are entangled and data is governed by the uncertainty principle.


10 posted on 11/10/2005 8:22:36 PM PST by OSHA (I've got a hole in my head too, but that's beside the point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OSHA

LOL
Steven Wright couldn't put it any better.


11 posted on 11/10/2005 8:26:07 PM PST by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: operation clinton cleanup
I hope you mean funny "HaHa" and not funny strange!

Well, I suppose that will depend on what you mean by "HaHa." :)

12 posted on 11/10/2005 8:26:31 PM PST by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
I mean I read your post and laughed real hard and even shared it with my family.

Thanks, glad I could spread some good cheer!

13 posted on 11/10/2005 8:28:13 PM PST by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ModelBreaker
Well, I suppose that will depend on what you mean by "HaHa." :)

Not this kind...


14 posted on 11/10/2005 8:30:39 PM PST by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter

"David DiVincenzo compared the potential of quantum computing to the possibilities generated in 1947 when transistors were invented."

... Or to the invention of the 8-track!


15 posted on 11/10/2005 8:35:56 PM PST by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter
For a couple of years, now, I've suspected that the U.S. government (specifically, the N.S.A.) has access to large-scale quantum computation.

This would necessarily be one of the most closely guarded secrets in the world. Whoever has access to QC can immediately break almost any cryptographic scheme (except for one-time pads and quantum cryptography). Of course the government would go to great lengths to protect this monopoly.

I believe this because 1) the N.S.A. has effectively unlimited, off-budget resources at its disposal, 2) the ability of QC to break all public-key cryptographic schemes is not a matter of conjecture; it is only a matter of engineering, and 3) the N.S.A. has recruited and cultivated many--perhaps most--of the brightest minds in the relevant fields.

How could they NOT throw unprecedented resources at this one engineering problem? If they're not there yet, they're far in the lead.

16 posted on 11/10/2005 8:38:18 PM PST by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ModelBreaker

If ironic or Kovacs-lent bonds are formed then the charm and strange quarks are irretrievably comingled making it impossible to determine the exact nature of the funniness of the related comment.


17 posted on 11/10/2005 8:54:47 PM PST by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear

It's a good question. Transparent aluminum finally made its much-anticipated debut, but we're still waiting to see when the first flux capacitors will become commercially available.


18 posted on 11/10/2005 8:56:10 PM PST by Zeppo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear
If ironic or Kovacs-lent bonds are formed then the charm and strange quarks are irretrievably comingled making it impossible to determine the exact nature of the funniness of the related comment.

That's sort of what I was thinking, too. Only you said it better.

19 posted on 11/10/2005 9:00:21 PM PST by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
Whoever has access to QC can immediately break almost any cryptographic scheme (except for one-time pads and quantum cryptography). Of course the government would go to great lengths to protect this monopoly.

My first thoughts as I read the title. Once this 'cat gets out of the bag,' everyone going to need new encryption schemes.

20 posted on 11/10/2005 9:03:06 PM PST by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson