Sexual Affairs between Pupils and Teachers ‘Can Be Beneficial’ Says UK Prof

LifeSite ^ | November 11, 2005 | Terry Vanderheyden

[NYer]

Coming to a school near you.

Already there! A local teacher has been imprisoned for having sexual relations with 3 of her male students.

[sit-rep]

lol...

[CzarNicky]

Someone's been listening to the Police's "Don't Stand So CLose to Me" a bit much.

My thoughts too.

[WhiteGuy]

A professor of education is contending that sexual relations between pupils and teachers can lend a beneficial “erotic charge” to the classroom.

Where was this thinking when I was in Miss Lynch's 7th grade math class???

(picture Michelle Malkin writing on the chalk board)

[flada]

lol... Your post is a good example of why the Slippery Slope is condidered a logical fallacy.

[Eric in the Ozarks]

This teacher needs a date.

[Barney Gumble]

Excellent point!

[pogo101]

Don't stand

Don't stand so

Don't stand so close to me

[CzarNicky]

The greatest irony is that it may be the students saying that to the teacher rather than the other way around as in the song.

[Right Wing Assault]

Slippery Slope is condidered a logical fallacy

Of course I took it too far on purpose for the humorous effect, but I am sure it will march along about half of my list.

[Graymatter]

I'll wager Justice Ginsburg concurs.

[Fred Hayek]

No doubt that there are some profs at the University of Minnesota that would also concur with this as well. U of M Press a few years ago published a book effectively endorsing child molestation.

I live in Minnesota, own part of a business here, but DO NOT EVER CALL ME A MINNESOTAN.

[newzjunkey]

I wonder how long before the "lucky kid" crowd wander into this thread. Oh wait, she's writing about young girls, not boys.

She's nuts. The question I have is what peer-review journal has the desire to kill its credibility to publish her paper?

[Mister Da]

I guess I'm getting old, as I can't tell a 14 year old girl from a 22 year old one. 22 YO hormones aren't much more mature that 14 YO hormones. A bad mix, IMO.

Way too much sex in school. Was then, is now. Folks want to know why the schools want to involve themselves in their child's sex education. That's because that's where they are getting that education - in the hall, classroom, library, storeroom, under the bleachers, in the bathroom - and that was 35+ years ago.

Any guy out there who ever dropped a pencil or book in class knows EXACTLY what I'm talking about.

Segregate the boys from the girls, teachers & most admin, too, from age 11 thru high school. Plenty of time for that after school, & the responsibility for this behavior (perfectly natural) falls back to the parents, where it belongs. And their exposure to male & female role models (respectively) will help kids lacking in this area.

As to GLAAD students & teachers, the above plan could get messy.

[tutstar]

hogwash

[Sir Francis Dashwood]

I really tried to convince my comely, young high school librarian of this when I proposed matrimony to no avail. I gave it a shot, young and dumb as I was...

[trebb]

A pervert tries to justify his baseness.

[darkangel82]

Didn't they get in trouble for that not long ago?

[SaltyJoe]

I wonder how many college professors are teaching in universities because:

1. they are trying to have sex with as many students as possible (being that today's youth are "easy pickings")

and/or,

2. they use minors to get drugs for them.

[dsc]

"Slippery Slope is condidered a logical fallacy"

Especially by those who have used them so skillfully in the service of the leftist agenda. Slippery slopes -- real, not false -- have been their best friends.