Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/13/2005 3:49:43 PM PST by Crackingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
To: PatrickHenry

You have been pung.


2 posted on 11/13/2005 3:51:47 PM PST by balrog666 (A myth by any other name is still inane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

Spectre-Part-II-BUMP!


3 posted on 11/13/2005 3:52:55 PM PST by LibertarianInExile (Let O'Connor Go Home! Hasn't She Suffered Enough? Hasn't The CONSTITUTION Suffered Enough?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

If faith baised issues should not be taught in schools, then evolution (as it applies to the origin of man) should not be taught there either.

If one unsustainable theory can be taught there, then all unsustainable theories should be able to be taught there.


4 posted on 11/13/2005 3:54:20 PM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

I can't imagine why Santorum would even stick his foot into this one way or the other. No wonder he's so unpopular lately.


5 posted on 11/13/2005 3:55:53 PM PST by marsh_of_mists
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham
Ah, this is just typical MSM pitting one religious person against another. Santorum is Catholic so he is pro-evolution. No surprise there. Of course he won't argue in favor of teaching a theory he disagrees with, though it would be nice if he had the class to support debate. Clearly the media long ago gave up on true political debate. In the media, the deck is always stacked in favor of liberals.

At this point I do not care whether intelligent design wins or not. It's not my theory entirely either. I just like the debate. But I don't care because I do not believe in the public school system. They are anti-Christian in every way -- every last one of them.

9 posted on 11/13/2005 4:00:56 PM PST by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Righteousness exalts a nation, but sin is a disgrace to any people. Ps. 14:34)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

Santorum - watch how fast this guys scrambles for anyone to like him.

Run Ricky run...


13 posted on 11/13/2005 4:07:29 PM PST by Jake The Goose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham; Victoria Delsoul
The ROT of "itching ears" Spreads:

Santorum said flatly Saturday, "I disagree. I don't believe God abandons people,"

Remember these verses, Rick?

Remember the Garden of Eden?
Genesis Chapter 3, verse 4. "And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die:"....Gen. 3:23-24 "23. therefore Jehovah God sent him forth from the garden of Eden, to till the ground from whence he was taken. 24. So he drove out the man; and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden the Cherubim, and the flame of a sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life."

Or how about the Flood?
Genesis 6:13-14 "13. And God said unto Noah, The end of all flesh is come before me; for the earth is filled with violence through them; and, behold, I will destroy them with the earth. 14. Make thee an ark..."

And perhaps you also don't believe in Sodom & Gomorrah?
Genesis 19:24-25. "Then Jehovah rained upon Sodom and upon Gomorrah brimstone and fire from Jehovah out of heaven. 25. And he overthrew those cities, and all the Plain, and all the inhabitants of the cities, and that which grew upon the ground."

I wonder if this habit of supposedly Christian-subscribing politicians reading out of existence these clear expressions of God's righteousness...and previous practice of "abandonment" of sinning people (those who consciously abandon God)...is a good indication of a similar inclination by these politicians to disregard the U.S. Constitution?

18 posted on 11/13/2005 4:19:13 PM PST by Paul Ross ("The nine most terrifying words in the English language are: 'I'm from the govt and I'm here to help)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham
Though Santorum said he believes that intelligent design is "a legitimate issue," he doesn't believe it should be taught in the classroom, adding that he had concerns about some parts of the theory.

That's a big flip-flop from the Santorum admendment he proposed in the No Child Left Behind act

Too bad he learned a little too late that replacing science with mythology is a losing issue

19 posted on 11/13/2005 4:20:13 PM PST by qam1 (There's been a huge party. All plates and the bottles are empty, all that's left is the bill to pay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

Vain weathervane.


21 posted on 11/13/2005 4:22:57 PM PST by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

"Robertson warned residents, "If there is a disaster in your area, don't turn to God, you just rejected him from your city."

What an idiot.


31 posted on 11/13/2005 4:31:00 PM PST by WildTurkey (True Creationism makes intelligent design actually seem intelligent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

he's cracking up. whats next? Rick's gonna say is Roe v Wade is cool too!!
now he's just one more Rino in the herd.

I can't believe I once touted lil' Rickie as presidental material. Evan sported a "Santorum08" tagline till the 04primary. Now he doesn't miss a chance to rub my nose and conservative values in the sh*t.


44 posted on 11/13/2005 4:36:34 PM PST by gdc61 (see ya later GOP.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

Santorum in panic mode and abandoning his principles Barf Alert!


68 posted on 11/13/2005 4:52:49 PM PST by balch3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

Santorum is moving so far left he will be to the left of Specter.


76 posted on 11/13/2005 4:57:59 PM PST by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham
".....Santorum: Don't put intelligent design in classroom........"

Thank God someones got some sense!!!!!!!!!!

114 posted on 11/13/2005 5:29:57 PM PST by DoctorMichael (The Fourth-Estate is a Fifth-Column!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

Good grief! Please don't tell me Santorum, of all people, is already choking and going the "moderate" route because he's running scared from the scumbag liberal Democrat press??

If so, he is chasing away the "broken glass" conservative base that gets him elected.
If so, he is toast.


130 posted on 11/13/2005 5:41:15 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

You know, "intelligent design" is about the crappiest name I ever heard for something purportedly undertaken by God. Whoever came up with the moniker "intelligent design", anyway? Yeccch.


136 posted on 11/13/2005 5:45:24 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

>>>Santorum's comments to The Times are a shift from his position of several years ago, when he wrote in a Washington Times editorial that intelligent design is a "legitimate scientific theory that should be taught in the classroom."<<<

I believe this is called pandering.


171 posted on 11/13/2005 6:07:56 PM PST by PhilipFreneau ("Resist the devil, and he will flee from you." - James 4:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

Sounds like Santorum knows he's down in the pols in PA and saw what happened to the Dover school board. He knows the losing side of an issue and isn't taking any chances.


183 posted on 11/13/2005 6:22:34 PM PST by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

Science leads you where the establishment-approved scientists lead you.


198 posted on 11/13/2005 6:37:39 PM PST by skr (Shopping for a tagline that fits or a fitting tagline...whichever I find first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

Santorum has become unpredictable. Unpredictable means incapable of being trusted anymore.


212 posted on 11/13/2005 6:55:38 PM PST by Minuteman23
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson