Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: b_sharp

Okay, the evidence does not sustain what you folks claim it does. You love to make 'wink and a nod' comments about Christians who accept creation on faith, but then excuse away your belief in things that can't be proven as scientific.

The flimsey evidence that exists to support the theory of evolution (from single cell to man) is just that, flimsey. You can't point to another theory that you will accept, so yours must be the only one.

In the dark ages, it was the Christians who vilified scientific thinkers. Today it's the scientific thinkers turn.


141 posted on 11/13/2005 5:48:14 PM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne
The flimsey evidence that exists to support the theory of evolution (from single cell to man) is just that, flimsey.

Why is it flimsy?

You can't point to another theory that you will accept, so yours must be the only one.

What other theories are there? Be specific, and explain exactly how the explanations that you give meet the requirements to be considered "theory".
144 posted on 11/13/2005 5:49:20 PM PST by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies ]

To: DoughtyOne
In the dark ages, it was the Christians who vilified scientific thinkers. Today it's the scientific thinkers turn.

Isn't Santorum being vilified for keeping I.D. out of science class?

158 posted on 11/13/2005 5:56:03 PM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies ]

To: DoughtyOne
"Okay, the evidence does not sustain what you folks claim it does. You love to make 'wink and a nod' comments about Christians who accept creation on faith, but then excuse away your belief in things that can't be proven as scientific.

Huh? Did you understand a thing I said? Evolution has been verified multiple times and ways.

"The flimsey evidence that exists to support the theory of evolution (from single cell to man) is just that, flimsey. You can't point to another theory that you will accept, so yours must be the only one.

Show me another theory that does a better job at explaining our observations, then we'll talk.

There is much more to evolution than just the lineage from single celled organisms to man. Why do you insist on relying on that one point to show all of evolution false?

"In the dark ages, it was the Christians who vilified scientific thinkers. Today it's the scientific thinkers turn.

What?

265 posted on 11/13/2005 7:51:59 PM PST by b_sharp (Ad space for rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson