[Dimensio]

What it all boils down to is that you folks have observed some evolution, and voyola, that's the definitive basis for the origion of man. Nah. It may be. It may not be. It is not definitive.

Definitive? No. Nothing in science is beyond reproach. However, to claim that it is purely "faith based" implies either that you've not studied the issue at all or you are dishonestly misrepresenting the information published in support of the theory. It's far more than speculation and conjecture.

[Gumlegs]

However, to claim that it is purely "faith based" implies either that you've not studied the issue at all or you are dishonestly misrepresenting the information published in support of the theory.

I wouldn't rule out the former, but at this point the latter is unquestionable.

[DoughtyOne]

Look you know as well as I do that there are glaring gaps in the map of the progression of man from his single celled days.  I don't expect you to provide every single step, but you folks can't even come close.  Yes there is evidence of evolution.  There isn't evidence of what evolutionists have adopted as gospel.

No, it's not much more than speculation and conjecture and you know it.