[dufekin]

I'm thinking, YES, Rockefeller obviously knew more--and told our enemies the Syrians far more--than he revealed this weekend. And they conspired together perhaps for the mutual benefit. Syria got weapons of mass destruction, and the Democrats got political power. Don't think the Democrats are that treasonous? Witness Jim Baghdad McDermott, who traveled treasonously to meet with the enemy and proclaim from the capital city of the enemy that he trusted the enemy more than his own leaders.

Then again, the American people have an insatiable appetite for liberalism--treason, taxation, trepidation, et cetera.

[Enchante]

I don't doubt for a moment that people like Rockefeller were traipsing over to Baghdad and Damascus saying, in one way or another, "whatever you guys do here, make sure there are no WMDs lying around Iraq for Bush to find" (though we did find some in a few scattered spots) - I think Rockefeller and McDermott etc. were in at least tacit if not open collusion to make sure Saddam pretended to clean up his act - either they would avert the war or else they would end up having a useful cause celebre against the Bush administration. Is Rockefeller capable of such treason? Without a doubt...... his methods and outlook were spelled out in the covert memo from his staff that leaked out about using the Senate Intelligence Committee to assault the Bush WH.