Make no mistake, Pirro is an anti-Indian-Point-nuclear grandstanding RINO! NO RINOs! We have plenty of examples of what voting for RINOs has gotten the conservative movement. Don't waste your time or money on that )$(##@#!I live in Brooklyn and you can be sure that the lever next to Pirro's name will never be pulled when it is my turn in the booth. F the RINOs.
I guess I'm the only one on this thread who agrees with you.
I mean I hate RINOs as much as the next guy but it's simple math: Pirro's the only one in striking distance. Period.
Hillary is enemy number one. Defeating her is the Battle of the Bulge.
Any real conservative winning the nomination or splitting the vote would be a pyrrhic victory. Hillary could phone that one in.
Only Pirro can inflict a cost of time and resources. She can't win unless Hillary withdraws completely to run for Pres (in which case whoopee!). So unless she does, there's no risk of another RINO in the Senate.
In spite of his hatred for the Soviets, Winston Churchill condemned the Nazi invasion of the USSR, saying "If Hitler invaded hell I would make at least a favorable reference to the devil in the House of Commons."