Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ban Asian (Pakastani) Marriages To Cousins, Says MP (UK)
The Telegraph (UK) ^ | 11-16-2005 | Marco Giannangeli

Posted on 11/15/2005 8:26:03 PM PST by blam

Ban Asian marriages of cousins, says MP

By Marco Giannangeli
(Filed: 16/11/2005)

Marriages between cousins should be banned after research showed alarming rates in defective births among Asian communities in Britain, a Labour MP said last night.

The report, commissioned by Ann Cryer, revealed that the Pakistani community accounted for 30 per cent of all births with recessive disorders, despite representing 3.4 per cent of the birth rate nationwide.

"We address problems of smoking, drinking, obesity and we say it's a public health issue, therefore we have to get involved with persuading people to adopt a different lifestyle," the MP for Keighley, Bradford, told BBC2's Newsnight programme last night.

"I think this should be applied to the Asian community. They must look outside the family for husbands and wives for their young people."

It is estimated that more than 55 per cent of British Pakistanis are married to first cousins, resulting in an increasing rate of genetic defects and high rates of infant mortality. The likelihood of unrelated couples having the same variant genes that cause recessive disorders are estimated to be 100-1. Between first cousins, the odds increase to as much as one in eight.

In Bradford, more than three quarters of all Pakistani marriages are believed to be between first cousins. The city's Royal Infirmary Hospital has identified more than 140 different recessive disorders among local children, compared with the usual 20-30.

The findings were expected to be condemned by the Asian community, in which many see the tradition of marriages between first cousins as culturally fundamental.

"You have an understanding, you have the same family history," said Neila Butt, who has had two children with her husband, Farooq, her first cousin. "It's just a nicer emotional feel."


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: asian; ban; cousins; marriages; mp; pakastani; uk

1 posted on 11/15/2005 8:26:04 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam

Won't that mean the British royal family will be outlawed?


2 posted on 11/15/2005 8:27:51 PM PST by hang 'em
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jan in Colorado; Fred Nerks; Dark Skies
One for the road, I couldn't resist it. I'm calling a:

Defective Muslims PING

3 posted on 11/15/2005 8:29:04 PM PST by USF (I see your Jihad and raise you a Crusade ™ © ®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

BTW, this is a huge problem in Saudi too.. it's the parents fault for keeping these backward practices going, when they should know better in this day and age. The kids I feel sorry for... the defective mentality of the parents and imams and muftis who support things like this need to be addresed.


4 posted on 11/15/2005 8:34:22 PM PST by USF (I see your Jihad and raise you a Crusade ™ © ®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Ah Ha.....NOW we know why they act the way they do...Ah Ha! It's INBRED!


5 posted on 11/15/2005 8:35:31 PM PST by goodnesswins (DEMS....40 yrs and $$$dollars for the War on Poverty, but NOT a $$ or minute for the WAR on Terror!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hang 'em
"Won't that mean the British royal family will be outlawed?"

Not that I'm defending the Asian family tradition of incest and adolescent sex, but I agree that these liberals in Britain should clean their own house before trying to change other nations. One look at Prince Charles is enough to make anyone understand that inter-family breeding is revolting.

6 posted on 11/15/2005 8:37:19 PM PST by TheCrusader ("The frenzy of the Mohammedans has devastated the churches of God" -Pope Urban II, 1097AD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam
"You have an understanding, you have the same family history," said Neila Butt, who has had two children with her husband, Farooq, her first cousin. "It's just a nicer emotional feel."

Right. At a party, I met a very attractive couple in their 30s who were about to get married. "Amazing," I said. "You obviously belong together, you look so much alike." Everyone blushed. Turned out that the young couple were brother and sister, literally separated at birth and adopted by two different families. It was one of those EEEeeeeeeeeUuuuuuuuuuu moments.

But yes, there certainly was an almost palpable emotional bond between them. How that translates into the DNA of a child they might have is rather an EeeeeeUuuuuuu concept too.

7 posted on 11/15/2005 8:41:05 PM PST by Veto! (Opinions freely dispensed as advice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

I can barely tolerate being in the same room as some of my first cousins, the thought of marrying them is just absurd.
i guess with all of Islam's 'Great Moments in Science' they apparently missed the part about consanguinaity and birth defects.


8 posted on 11/15/2005 8:52:37 PM PST by Nipplemancer (Abolish the DEA !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins
Ah Ha.....NOW we know why they act the way they do...Ah Ha! It's INBRED!

Anti-inbreeding-Mooselimb Sarcasm Torpedo ARMED. FIRE!!

It's what I always called 'em:

"The Hatfields and the Abdullahs!"

No wonder they can't get along with anyone...

Cheers!

9 posted on 11/15/2005 8:54:36 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Veto!
"You have an understanding, you have the same family history," said Neila Butt, who has had two children with her husband, Farooq, her first cousin. "It's just a nicer emotional feel."

So their kids will be "butt-ugly" then...

10 posted on 11/15/2005 8:56:00 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TheCrusader

Not that I'm defending the British Royal Family, but their level of consanguity is absolutely mild in comparison to TROP inbreeding practices.

These cultures have been practicing 1st cousin and Uncle/niece marriages as SOP for a millenia. They've made their DNA into a toxic waste dump of recessive defects.

You'd think they'd look at their sick and genetically damaged children and get a clue.


11 posted on 11/15/2005 9:02:04 PM PST by Valpal1 (Crush jihadists, drive collaborators before you, hear the lamentations of their media. Allahu FUBAR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Valpal1

Yes their gene pool is the ultimate superfund site.


12 posted on 11/15/2005 9:10:21 PM PST by dagnabbit (Vincente Fox's opening line at the Mexico-USA summit meeting: "Bring out the Gimp!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: rmlew; Clemenza; Do not dub me shapka broham
ping



13 posted on 11/15/2005 9:12:17 PM PST by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valpal1
You'd think they'd look at their sick and genetically damaged children and get a clue.

It has been speculated that the centuries of inbreeding among arabs is the reason for their mindlessly homicidal behavior.

14 posted on 11/15/2005 9:13:17 PM PST by kimosabe31
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Valpal1; kimosabe31; Veto!; blam; grey_whiskers; dagnabit; Cacique

http://www.parapundit.com/archives/000113.html#000113


15 posted on 11/15/2005 9:43:45 PM PST by Do not dub me shapka broham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Valpal1
"You'd think they'd look at their sick and genetically damaged children and get a clue."

They're an idol-worshipping cult of medieval mentality barbarians, so their chance of getting a clue as to behaving civilly is slim.

It's interesting to note how, even in this age, they live in tribal communities, practice incest, amputate limbs for petty crimes, subjugate women like dogs and have lived in a cultural standstill for about 1,400 years. I can imagine how the Christians of the Crusades periods must have feared these neanderthals, they didn't have superior technology like we have today to fight them off with.

16 posted on 11/15/2005 10:07:26 PM PST by TheCrusader ("The frenzy of the Mohammedans has devastated the churches of God" -Pope Urban II, 1097AD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: blam

If they outlaw marriage to cousins, that will leave only siblings.


17 posted on 11/15/2005 10:34:52 PM PST by Bob J (RIGHTALK.com...a conservative alternative to NPR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Ah ha! Know we know why the women have bags over their heads!


18 posted on 11/15/2005 11:01:13 PM PST by hardworking (Hey, what do I know? I'm just one of the 'ordinary people' who has to earn a living.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

This is a HUGE problem.

Just look at our South. (Just kidding).


19 posted on 11/16/2005 3:46:24 AM PST by tkathy (Ban the headscarf. (All religious headdress). The effect will creat a huge domino effect..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson