[b_sharp]

"Hehehe. Let's take a car over to some aboriginal tribe and set it out in the forest without their knowledge. Then, when they happen upon it, we can record their reaction and see if they are so stupid as to think it sprung up out of the ground as a product of something totally unguided, totally undesigned, totally unintelligent. Just a fluke in every day matter. Just "nature taking its course." Hahahaha!

Your suggestion of this shows you have no idea how we differentiate between human designed and manufactured objects, and naturally occurring objects. It also shows a lack of knowledge about aboriginals.

[Coyoteman]

Excerpt from the last substantive conversation I had with Fester:

I, Fester Chugabrew, am a Young Earth Creationist. I do not accept geology, or radiometric dating, or any part of modern science that might support an old Earth or evolution. Furthermore, I do not accept creation or evolution as proper objects of science in the strict sense. Lastly, VadeRetro notwithstanding, I attribute all tendencies toward verbal putzitude to be a product of those who ignore, disavow, or otherwise impugn the authority of biblical texts [08/06/2005].

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1456767/posts?page=201#201 .

[Fester Chugabrew]

Are you saying it is scientifcally feasible to differentiate between humanly designed and non-humanly designed entities?

[Fester Chugabrew]

Also, are processes of intelligent design strictly limited to humans? IOW, are humanly devised implements the only evidence in the universe for intelligent design?