I can drop a rock and see the effects of gravity. Show me the beginning of life thru evolution using facts and we'll see how well your science theory holds up.
Do you not pay attention to what you are presented with on these threads? Or do you just not believe in evidence, and hence ignore what we say. You have been told many times that the beginning of life is not a part of evolution, yet you continue to insist that it is.
Evolution is about change, not origins. There are a lot of examples in PatrickHenry's List-O-Links, but you probably won't believe them either.
Do you really expect to impress anybody with your arguments if you cannot even get the basics correct? From your arguments, and the rigor of your method, it seems like you are promoting religious belief, not doing science.
Seem to my that ID is more aboput origins than change. If that is the case, why do evolutionists attack ID? Based on your statement the two have nothing to do with the other.
Darwinian evolutiuon certainly did address the origin of life when I was in school; the whole primordial soup thing. Problem is advancement in the sciences clearly established the impossibility of such a claim, so much so that evolutionists had to simply drop all references or inferences about the origin of life.
To claim that evolution never address the origin of life is a lie.
If there is no beginning how can there be change? I guess what you are saying is that since you don't have an answer there is no need to pursue it. Sounds like a copout to me.