Posted on 11/17/2005 6:37:51 PM PST by blam
Iran in turmoil as president's purge deepens
Simon Tisdall and Ewen MacAskill
Friday November 18, 2005
The Guardian (UK)
Iran is facing political paralysis as its newly elected president purges government institutions, bringing accusations that he is undertaking a coup d'état. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's clearout of his opponents began last month but is more sweeping than previously understood and has reached almost every branch of government, the Guardian has learned. Dozens of deputy ministers have been sacked this month in several government departments, as well the heads of the state insurance and privatisation organisations. Last week, seven state bank presidents were dismissed in what an Iranian source described as "a coup d'état".
(Excerpt) Read more at guardian.co.uk ...
This is the guy that Chuck Hagel wanted America to kiss up too.
Oh oh...this is a dangerous situation made worse.
As long as we fund them by buying their publications.
Will China tolerate and protect an aggressive despot in return for a guarantee of oil? Absolutely. Will Russia and the EU forgo commercial interests in the pursuit of regional peace? Absolutely not.
I'd love to be wrong about this but I think it's likely that Ahmadinejad will put a tight little police state in place before any revolution can begin. He certainly has a good start - the basij for storm troopers and a well-developed intelligence network that has thoroughly infiltrated the dissidents. Should an untimely accident happen to Rafsanjani we'll know. Should the latter suddenly change his tune we'll know as well.
> Dozens of deputy ministers have been sacked this month in several government departments,
Why do I get the impression that "sacked" means something entirely different in Islamic societies like Iran?
I'm worried you're correct. And, with the way the Dems are stampeding to 'surrender' I expect we will have little influence there. Iran will get their nukes, just watch.
One way is to get officially dis-approved before competing in Iranian elections in the first place. This was [the] moment the system really started to crack up... Admittedly [the] precise moment is open to debate because the Islamic Republic was born ideologically bankrupt.
The Letter the Iranian Government Doesnt Want You to Read
As published in Shargh (reformist), Tehran, Iran, Feb. 18, 2004 - Members of the Iranian legislative assembly, or Majlis, restrain conservative legislator Ghodratollah Alikhani (in the turban) from striking reformist legislator Reza Yussefian (off camera) at the opening session of the new Majlis, Feb. 23, 2004 (Photo: Atta Kenare/AFP-Getty Images).
On Feb. 18, 2004, in the immediate run up to the controversial Iranian legislative elections, two reformist Iranian newspapers, Yas-e no and Shargh, published an open letter to Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei signed by 70 reformist legislators who had resigned to protest a decree forbidding more than half of the candidates from running. The next day, the Tehran prosecutors office ordered the papers closed. Criticising the supreme leader is a criminal offence in Iran...
Re: definition of "sacked":
> One way is to get officially dis-approved before competing in Iranian elections in the first place.
For some reason, I can't believe the Iranian government will leave it at that. Those disapproved candidates are an underground opposition just waiting to happen. Best to dispatch them promptly is the meme, I would imagine.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.