Skip to comments.
India to vote against Iran again
Times of India ^
| November 19, 2005
| Indrani Bagchi
Posted on 11/18/2005 1:16:13 PM PST by glow-worm005
NEW DELHI: India looks set to go against Iran once again on November 24 at the IAEA as the prospect of a vote is looking increasingly difficult to avert. The decision, taken at the highest levels of the Indian government, comes even as the Left parties upped the ante, even leveraging its support to UPA on the issue.
A last-ditch effort is currently under way to salvage a consensus India has thrown its weight behind a Russia-EU compromise proposal to Tehran which will allow conversion of uranium inside Iran, but its enrichment to be in Russia.
Thus far, there are no signs that Iran may accept the proposal. In fact, its latest action of restarting uranium enrichment at its Isfahan facility will make it difficult for even its prime energy partner and close ally Russia to take a sympathetic view.
Faced with such a scenario, the Manmohan Singh government is bracing itself for a decision that, on the face of it, may have an effect on UPAs relations with Left parties. While government recognises the need to humour the Left, it is clear that it cannot possibly reverse its vote at IAEA or can acquiesce in what it calls the attempt to "communalise" foreign policy.
Irans insistence on its right to the full nuclear fuel cycle, despite Tehran initially opening up nuclear facilities to IAEA inspectors, will make it untenable for India to either vote against a tough resolution or even abstain.
Apart from the fact that an about turn will be difficult to explain when the rationale for the September vote not only remains the same but has become stronger two months down the line, the governments approach is determined also by the resolve not to jeopardise the landmark nuclear agreement with US.
A "no" vote on whether to discipline Iran will be tantamount to handing a weapon to the powerful non-proliferation lobby in Washington already out to scupper the deal.
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: india; iran
To: glow-worm005
Iran is about to self destruct. The madman they put in charge is planning to go out with a bang.
2
posted on
11/18/2005 1:20:32 PM PST
by
Brilliant
To: glow-worm005
India to vote against Iran again OUTSTANDING!
3
posted on
11/18/2005 11:12:07 PM PST
by
humint
To: humint; glow-worm005; Brilliant
The Left not looking rightCommunists may be playing a perilous game with Indian Shias
By Sankarshan Thakur
 |
The sudden muddying of Indias position on the iaea Iran vote, courtesy nervous outbursts of the beleaguered Natwar Singh, does little credit to a country that sees itself and is increasingly seen by others as a sure-mature adult in the comity of nations. Decisions such as these India had cast itself against Iran in the last iaea meet are taken with due deliberation, not merely on the specific issue concerned, but also on wider implications such decisions might have. For a domestic scandal to suddenly plunge a key international decision into uncertainty is not the sign of a grown up polity, irrespective of whether that decision is right or wrong. There were reasons India decided to vote against Iran at the iaea; the travails of Natwar Singh cannot be seen to be altering those reasons, or Indian foreign policy. But there is a far more alarming trend unfolding around Indias position at the iaea over Iran sensitive domestic concerns are being linked to what is essentially a foreign policy issue. And the Left, otherwise the more enlightened of our political formations, is leading the way up what could be a perilous path. For well-established ideological reasons, the Left was opposed to India voting with the United States and other western countries against Iran at the iaea. But when Natwar Singh suddenly found himself engulfed by the Volcker revelations, the Left saw its chance and moved even harder; it went out of its way to support Natwar Singh, it may even have encouraged him to threaten a flip of the vote on live television. There is a basic fallacy here with the Leftist argument. At home, they support, and very rightly, a secular dispensation; the religious politics of the Hindu Right is anathema to them. And so it should be in a country constitutionally and emotionally committed to secular principles. But in the case of Iran, they are prepared to back a regime that is the flip side of what a Hindu Rashtra might be. As events made apparent, the Left was prepared to go even further. At a rally in Lucknow, Left leaders openly spoke of the close cultural links Indian Shias have with Iran in order to beat up support for a change in the Indian vote. There is no questioning the strong religious and cultural links Shias in this country and the world over have with Iran. But to argue that foreign policy should be altered because of these links is to open the Shias to exactly the kind of allegation that Right-wing zealots in this country have been making about Indian Muslims at large that their loyalties lie elsewhere. Were Iran to put a foot wrong tomorrow and it could, given the tenor of its ruling dispensation are we to then justify persecuting Indian Shias for the actions of the Iranian regime? Slicing off Indian Shia sentiment and linking it to our foreign policy is a dangerous tactic. It will only make Indias minorities even more vulnerable.
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson