Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

In Strong Terms, Rome Is to Ban Gays as Priests
New York Times ^ | 11-23-05 | IAN FISHER and LAURIE GOODSTEIN

Posted on 11/22/2005 11:31:08 PM PST by jec1ny

In Strong Terms, Rome Is to Ban Gays as Priests By IAN FISHER and LAURIE GOODSTEIN ROME, Nov. 22 - A new Vatican document excludes from the priesthood most gay men, with few exceptions, banning in strong and specific language candidates "who are actively homosexual, have deep-seated homosexual tendencies, or support the so-called 'gay culture.' "

The long-awaited document, which has leaked out in sections over the last few months, was published Tuesday in Italian by an Italian Catholic Web site, AdistaOnline.it.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: catholic; gay; homosexual; homosexualagenda; popebenedictxvi; sin; vatican
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-255 next last

1 posted on 11/22/2005 11:31:08 PM PST by jec1ny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jec1ny

Good.


2 posted on 11/22/2005 11:32:15 PM PST by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sageb1

Amen.


3 posted on 11/22/2005 11:40:08 PM PST by Neanderthal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jec1ny

Good.


4 posted on 11/22/2005 11:41:58 PM PST by TASMANIANRED ("You cannot kill hope with bombs and bulletts." Sgt Clay.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jec1ny

I guess GM isn't the only organization laying off tens of thousands this week.


5 posted on 11/22/2005 11:44:42 PM PST by billybudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jec1ny

Equal rights for sodomites....NOT.


6 posted on 11/22/2005 11:45:09 PM PST by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jec1ny
banning in strong and specific language candidates "who are actively homosexual, have deep-seated homosexual tendencies, or support the so-called 'gay culture

A candidate who is actively homosexual is not celibate.

A priest who encourages homosexuality in the "gay community" encourages sin.

A priest who has homosexual tendencies has a burden of temptation but he may keep it in check. It is questionable to put him in a position of authority where he may manipulate someone into an affair, but I don't know how common that is.

If he acts on any of his sexual desires, he has sinned (regardless if it is with a man or a woman, an adult or a child). If thoughts of his carnal desires dominate his day, then he will probably not be a good moral leader. If he finds men more attractive than women but does not ever bring it up or act on that desire, I don't know that there is a problem.

I say this because if the position is to urge that sinners "go forth and sin no more", what sin is the priest committing? Lust? Depends on how much he thinks about it.

7 posted on 11/22/2005 11:49:37 PM PST by weegee (Christmas - the holiday that dare not speak its name.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jec1ny

I'm glad to hear this, but I think we should be prepared to be outraged by litagation that will result from this. Left-wing troublemakers will attempt to define the priesthood as a form of employment, and can be expected to mount legal challenges against the Church in America. Considerable amounts of tax money are given to the Church for its work with the poor, especially in big cities. This will be the hook, as will (possibly) be tax exemptions.

I hope I'm wrong.


8 posted on 11/22/2005 11:58:17 PM PST by Steely Tom (Fortunately, the Bill of Rights doesn't include the word 'is'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jec1ny

,,, window dressing from Rome, nothing more. It's clear from the full article that priests or intending priests would move to the likes of Rochester or Spokane for tea and sympathy and the ability to dodge mainstream Church policy.


9 posted on 11/23/2005 12:09:18 AM PST by shaggy eel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jec1ny; NYer

Antonio Gramsci is deeply saddened.


10 posted on 11/23/2005 12:13:42 AM PST by The Spirit Of Allegiance (SAVE THE BRAINFOREST! Boycott the RED Dead Tree Media & NUKE the DNC Class Action Temper Tantrum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jec1ny

Finally


11 posted on 11/23/2005 12:15:49 AM PST by Dustbunny (Main Stream Media -- Making 'Max Headroom' a reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EdReform; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; stage left; Yakboy; I_Love_My_Husband; ...

Homosexual Agenda Ping.

Sounds good. But what do I know? One poster thinks it's window dressing. To me, it sounds quite definite. My question is does it apply to men who are already ordained? Are homosexuals going to be flushed out of the priesthood? I hope with every fiber of my being that it will happen. For the good of the Catholic church and the rest of the world.

Freepmail me and DirtyHarryY2K if you want on/off this pinglist.


12 posted on 11/23/2005 12:20:19 AM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom
Left-wing troublemakers will attempt to define the priesthood as a form of employment, and can be expected to mount legal challenges against the Church in America.

Actually, religious positions have always been exempt from overview by the Department of Labor, and to a lesser extent, the IRS. The "free exercise thereof" clause of the first amendment to the Constitution has been successfully applied in cases like this, as well as the "free association" phrase.

In short, the position of a priest is a specific, controlled, personal, and optional post that is wholly controlled by the religious organization sponsoring it. They would have absolutely no case.

Rest easy, it's been tried with Baptist and Protestant pastoral positions previously and has been quashed without exception.

13 posted on 11/23/2005 12:20:59 AM PST by Republicanus_Tyrannus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jec1ny

bump for a later read.


14 posted on 11/23/2005 12:49:57 AM PST by babygene (Viable after 87 trimesters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jec1ny

Good news.

Now if we could only get the Methodists, Prebyterians and Epicopalians to do the same thing, we'd be in good shape.


15 posted on 11/23/2005 12:57:01 AM PST by ZULU (Fear the government which fears your guns. God, guts, and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom
"I'm glad to hear this, but I think we should be prepared to be outraged by litagation that will result from this. Left-wing troublemakers will attempt to define the priesthood as a form of employment, and can be expected to mount legal challenges against the Church in America. Considerable amounts of tax money are given to the Church for its work with the poor, especially in big cities. This will be the hook, as will (possibly) be tax exemptions.

I hope I'm wrong."

Permit me to set your mind at ease. Even the ACLU would rally to the Churches defense. No court would ever allow outsiders to dictate matters of faith to any church. Your concerns are baseless. The 1st ammnd protects churches from regulation in such matters.
16 posted on 11/23/2005 1:00:25 AM PST by jec1ny (Adjutorium nostrum in nomine Domine Qui fecit caelum et terram.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jec1ny
"who are actively homosexual,

This is the part that disturbs me! What if they are not "active" homosexuals, but are still homosexuals, do they get to be priests???

Too little, too late if you ask me. About 50 years too late!!!

17 posted on 11/23/2005 1:04:06 AM PST by blondee123 (America, America! God shed his grace on thee.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZULU
"Now if we could only get the Methodists, Prebyterians and Epicopalians to do the same thing, we'd be in good shape."

I can not speak to the Methodists or Presbyterians as I am not familiar with their views. And in any case there are many branches of these ever multiplying denominations. As for the Episcopalians; that church is apostate and I do not regard them as being Christian.
18 posted on 11/23/2005 1:04:13 AM PST by jec1ny (Adjutorium nostrum in nomine Domine Qui fecit caelum et terram.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: jec1ny

If this is true, this is a liberalization of the current (if not followed) policy.


19 posted on 11/23/2005 1:12:33 AM PST by nickcarraway (I'm Only Alive, Because a Judge Hasn't Ruled I Should Die...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jec1ny

SUPER! The Catholic Church has decided to follow God's Word. We have a real breakthough!


20 posted on 11/23/2005 2:26:12 AM PST by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-255 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson