Skip to comments.
Is Homosexuality Genetic or an Evil Force that Plays Mind Games with People?
AkeGreen.org ^
| July 20, 2003
| Ake Green
Posted on 11/24/2005 6:30:15 AM PST by A. Pole
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 361-380 next last
To: little jeremiah
That's not "Hate Speech", that's Love Speech. Bump.
To: bigsigh
scripter keeps bringing that up because he wants JR to get rid of me. I keep bringing it up to show people from where you're coming.
You've been attacking my character for so long I just started collecting the information to show everyone what you've previously said, how I've asked you for specifics and how you run away everytime.
122
posted on
11/24/2005 5:55:22 PM PST
by
scripter
("You don't have a soul. You are a soul. You have a body." - C.S. Lewis)
To: gidget7
Thank you for your kinds words.
123
posted on
11/24/2005 5:56:26 PM PST
by
scripter
("You don't have a soul. You are a soul. You have a body." - C.S. Lewis)
To: A. Pole
Do he seriously really has to ask? We all know. I mean seriously, how much BS can the minds of the world hold without blowing fecal matter from the ears of every human?
We all know. It is generally a father son, mother daughter relationship issue derived to such a point that babyboomers twisted it into a cultural normality-irregularity within the current generation, in order to validate their impedance of dealing with the WWII generation. Just a rouse perpetrated by a bunch of weak ass liberal babyboomers to afraid to take a stand for anything that would run counter to their hatred of the previous generation before their own.
124
posted on
11/24/2005 5:59:15 PM PST
by
Porterville
(beware the nature-nazis)
To: scripter
I can speak for myself. I am attacking you because your tatics are dishonest and harmful.
I don't run away. I get tired of your dance. You call it running away. I call it a break from your zealotry.
125
posted on
11/24/2005 5:59:22 PM PST
by
bigsigh
To: scripter
I provided specifics at the time. I recommended you attend a course in research methodology, I summarized the problems with the research you posted. What more do you want? The fact that you deny this or don't remember is not my problem.
126
posted on
11/24/2005 6:00:57 PM PST
by
bigsigh
To: A. Pole
Does he seriously really has to ask? We all know. I mean seriously, how much BS can the minds of the world hold without blowing fecal matter from the ears of every human?
We all know. It is generally a father/son, mother/daughter relationship issue, derived to such a point that babyboomers twisted it into a cultural normality-irregularity within the current generation, in order to validate their impedance of dealing with the WWII generation. Just a rouse perpetrated by a bunch of weak ass liberal babyboomers to afraid to take a stand for anything that would run counter to their hatred of the previous generation before their own.
127
posted on
11/24/2005 6:01:24 PM PST
by
Porterville
(beware the nature-nazis)
To: Jorge
The answer to the first para is yes it's possible.
Not everyone shares your religious beliefs. And they certainly should not be codified and forced upon the rest of the country.
128
posted on
11/24/2005 6:03:38 PM PST
by
bigsigh
To: scripter; little jeremiah
Boy, bigsigh has some real emotional problems.
To: tuesday afternoon
thanx doc for making a substantial contribution to the thread.
130
posted on
11/24/2005 6:23:55 PM PST
by
bigsigh
To: street_lawyer
Even the Catholic Church has recently made a clear distinction between the sin and the sinner. Homosexuals, who are not engaging in homosexual sex, and who do not openly approve or support the activity are suitable for admission into the clergy, just as any celibate individual is. I believe you misunderstood the Vatican document. Men with deeply-rooted homosexual tendencies, i.e. anyone who would identify as homosexual, chaste or not, are not to be ordained or admitted to seminaries.
To: bigsigh
You're more than welcome. I hope I was able to be of service to you.
To: tuesday afternoon
other than making my case about lack of substance you mean?
133
posted on
11/24/2005 6:27:34 PM PST
by
bigsigh
To: Savage Beast
I don't know whether it's genetic or what, but I am convinced that many homosexuals of both sexes are born that way, will always be that way, and cannot change. Are the schizophrenics the same way? Can people change in general? Do you believe in predestination? Can criminals change into good people and can good people become criminals?
134
posted on
11/24/2005 6:28:59 PM PST
by
A. Pole
(Marcus Lucanus: "Pigmies placed on the shoulders of giants see more than the giants themselves.")
To: bigsigh
Yes, I hope I was able to help you with your inability to discriminate between facts and your own distorted thinking your inability to preceive and provide pertinent information.
To: A. Pole
136
posted on
11/24/2005 6:31:43 PM PST
by
VOA
To: tuesday afternoon; street_lawyer
Tuesday, I agree with you. I read that document and was taking notice of many comments and interpretations on several threads about it. The only "exception" is men who had some confusion about homosexuality IN THE PAST and are three years beyond any of the confusion/attraction.
Anyone with homosexual identification or inclinations, who supports the "gay" agenda, what to speak of activity, is not permitted to be a priest.
It's very good. Now it just needs to be implemented.
To: taxed2death
No amount of praying or church has been able to change him.[...] It's my opinion that some people are just born that way. Are you saying that if people do not correct some vice then they must have been born that way? Do you believe in predestination?
138
posted on
11/24/2005 6:34:03 PM PST
by
A. Pole
(Marcus Lucanus: "Pigmies placed on the shoulders of giants see more than the giants themselves.")
To: A. Pole
To much to read. OK the bible is against queers. Men on Men , Women on Women will produce nothing of value and won't continue the population.
I don't like guys acting like girls and girls acting like guys and all the crap that goes on in the so called "Gay" community.
139
posted on
11/24/2005 6:36:42 PM PST
by
TNoldman
(911 took away my tolerance!)
To: Forest Keeper
I say that it would be a disservice to refer to the Bible as the most reliable science textbook. It is simply the most reliable book ever written. 600 years ago the finest scientists in the world would have told you that all available empirical evidence would show that the world was flat. 60 years ago the finest scientists would have said that according to all empirical evidence, that it was ludicrous to predict that men would be walking on the moon 25 years later. But, of course, today's scientists are different. They really know how to use empirical evidence. This time, scientists really have it figured out. Is that it? I think Einstein explained it like this: we used to think Zeus and some other Gods controlled the weather, but the more we learned about the forces of nature we pretty much predict the weather every day without the Bible. We make mistakes along the way, of course, but we get better and better at it. God has been pushed out of the weather, out of so many things I won't enumerate them here. Extraopolate, my good people, extraopolate (then there's no need to read the rest of his essay!). Incidentally, God is predicting rain tomorrow, so bring your umbrella.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 361-380 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson