Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cope85

US blinks in softwood standoff 11/24/2005 WASHINGTON -- The U.S. Commerce Department announced it would comply with a NAFTA panel's order to cut a 16 percent duty on Canadian softwood lumber imports -- for now. Even though the Bush Administration still strongly disagrees with the repeated NAFTA rulings in Canada's favor, it will comply, Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez said yesterday. "We have serious concerns about the panel's decision. However, consistent with our NAFTA obligations, we have complied with the panel's instructions," Gutierrez said in a press release.

The ruling effectively means that the Americans would reduce duties from about 16 percent to less than one per cent. Separate antidumping tariffs averaging about 4 percent will not be affected.

While protectionists oppose the move to lift softwood tariffs, US consumer groups applauded the move However, the government says it's asking for clarification of the ruling -- meaning the duties on Canadian imports can remain in place for another 45 days. Officials also added they have the right to appeal the ruling. The two counties have been at odds over the softwood issue for years. Canada says the duties are in violation of the free trade agreement. The U.S. has argued that Canadian softwood is subsidized because it's cut on Crown timberland, while U.S. softwood is sawed privately, placing it at a competitive disadvantage.

Canada accounts for about one-third of the U.S. supply of softwood, used mainly in homebuilding.

As expected, U.S. protectionist industry groups decried the move. However, consumer commended the Department of Commerce for "finally doing the honorable and right thing in recalculating lumber duties as directed."

American Consumers for Affordable Homes (ACAH), representing more than 95 percent of lumber consumption in the U.S., said such duties only punish consumers. "These duties on Canadian softwood lumber increase the cost of a new home by at least $1,000, pricing more than 300,000 families out of mortgage eligibility and home ownership," said Susan Petniunas, spokesperson for ACAH.

Industries that depend on lumber as an input and that oppose import restrictions include manufacturers of value-added wood products, lumber dealers, manufactured and on-site home builders, remodeling contractors, mattress and box springs manufacturers, and individuals, says ACAH.


2 posted on 11/27/2005 4:45:21 PM PST by cope85
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: cope85

come on in anyone


3 posted on 11/27/2005 4:46:18 PM PST by cope85
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: cope85

Right on schedule with merging our countries by 2010 as per the Council on Foreign Relations agenda.


6 posted on 11/27/2005 4:55:15 PM PST by Borax Queen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: cope85
The $3 million facility, which would be the first foreign customs office inside the United States, will likely be approved by the U.S. and Mexican governments by year's end and is scheduled to open next May, said Chris Gutierrez, president of Kansas City SmartPort Inc., a nonprofit organization promoting the project.

Does anyone still think that Bush REALLY plans to do ANYTHING about illegal immigration? I would REALLY like to say what I'm thinking about the traitors in the White House and Congress, but if I did, I'd get banned in a heartbeat.

Suffice to say, short of an armed revolution, America is doomed to become a third world country. The ONLY winners are the traitors!! We've been sold out for the big corporations!!!

46 posted on 11/27/2005 5:41:19 PM PST by NRA2BFree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: cope85

If you board a US bound airliner from Shannon, Ireland, you pass through US customs on Irish soil (well, back in the mid 1990's) It struck me as odd, but didn't bother me other than the fact we were paying US customs personnel to live in Ireland at taxpayers expense. Not sure this is something to get upset about if we do indeed have a vibrant export business with Mexico.


54 posted on 11/27/2005 8:48:23 PM PST by DancesWithBolsheviks (This space for rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson