Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mdmathis6
It is not logical that Nature(or Macro Evolution) should have produced such a creature antithetical to it

Why?

454 posted on 12/01/2005 7:37:42 AM PST by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 447 | View Replies ]


To: curiosity

Why not?

There are two arguements...one that macro-evolution maintains a rough balance with species rising or falling depending on conditions, mutations, rocks falling out of the sky ect. The other states that man has disrupted this balance, has destroyed ecosystems to suit his own avaricious hatred of the Earth to the point that our species could totally destroy itself and the very earth as well, especially as our science moves beyond mere atomic weapons which themselves could erase life on earth.

So how could Macro evolution have created an organism with a consciousness that acts antithetically to the processes that created it, that could very well destroy it through war fare or miscalculations in the manipulations of the very genetic codes of life?

That is the shadow of the mountain that biologists avoid adressing, the question that Christians maintain that Genesis chapter 3 addresses.


470 posted on 12/01/2005 1:22:31 PM PST by mdmathis6 ("It was not for nothing that you were named Ransom" from CS LEWIS' Perelandra!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 454 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson