Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dimensio
Science is based on observation not naturalism. Since we observe order and function in the universe, I think it is legitimate to infer a Designer, according to the laws of Cause and Effect.
460 posted on 12/01/2005 10:08:53 AM PST by attiladhun2 (evolution has both deified and degraded humanity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies ]


To: attiladhun2
Science is based on observation not naturalism.

It's based upon observations of the natural universe and tests of conclusions drawn from those observations. Non-natural claims cannot be tested and as such are worthless.

Since we observe order and function in the universe, I think it is legitimate to infer a Designer, according to the laws of Cause and Effect.

By what process would a Designer Design a universe? What observations lead you to conclude such a process is possible and was followed at some point. How can your claims be tested?
463 posted on 12/01/2005 10:57:15 AM PST by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 460 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson