[FarmerW]

CNNNBCCBS all pulled that story immediately and it was never heard from again.

I can understand why the MSM would be complicit in helping hide a Clinton failure. But why would they hide current attacks? (Just in general, not assuming this was one)

The only reason I can come up with is they fear the backlash while at first against Bush and Homeland Security, would ultimately keep Republicans in office as no one wants a Dem during the war.

Some one educate me. I feel like I am missing something here.

[Samwise]

But why would they hide current attacks?

Nothing can help justify the war in Iraq and the war on terrorism. To them, Bush is the enemy.

[somemoreequalthanothers]

Some one educate me. I feel like I am missing something here.

There's certainly more to it than we know. The same policy under two completely different administrations. I don't get it.

[Deguello]

"why would they hide current attacks?"

The TWA 800 case would have to be opened back up and would mean that this started under Clinton.

[null and void]

The only reason I can come up with is they fear the backlash while at first against Bush and Homeland Security, would ultimately keep Republicans in office as no one wants a Dem during the war.

Because Bush says the reason we are in Iraq is terrorism. Since *obviously* He lied, there must be no terrorism. Recognizing any terrorist act would put the MSM in the position of validating something Dubya has been saying.

This is clearly unacceptable!