Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sharp Objects May Be Allowed on Planes
AP ^

Posted on 11/30/2005 5:29:09 AM PST by zeke15

Sharp Objects May Be Allowed on Planes

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Airport security screeners are reportedly going to let passengers bring sharp objects on board airplanes again. Today's Washington Post says the Transportation Security Administration plans to announce security changes Friday.

Sources quoted by the paper say the new rules will allow things like scissors in carry-on bags. The reasoning is that such items are no longer regarded as the greatest threat to airline security. Homeland Security Department officials are said to be more concerned about preventing suicide bomb attacks at airports. Officials want screeners to focus more on finding things that can explode rather than things that are sharp.

The Post reports the newly relaxed rules would allow scissors under four inches long tools shorter than seven inches.

TSA spokeswoman says the new initiatives will be positive for both security and customer service.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-84 next last
Finally I won't have to suffer through another plane ride without my....SCISSORS?????

What are they thinking???!!!

1 posted on 11/30/2005 5:29:09 AM PST by zeke15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: zeke15

I miss the point of this. Was it a bomb, or a sharp object, that enabled the events of 9/11?


2 posted on 11/30/2005 5:31:07 AM PST by AbeKrieger (Islam is the virus that causes al-Qaeda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zeke15

Does this clear the way for Pointed Sticks?


3 posted on 11/30/2005 5:31:41 AM PST by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zeke15

I suggest everyone arm themselves with scissors. I just hope the terrorists don't bring a hole puncher to a scissor fight.


4 posted on 11/30/2005 5:33:44 AM PST by neodad (My ex-wife is stuck on stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
Does this clear the way for Pointed Sticks?

Yes. However, running with the afore mentioned pointed sticks is still a no-no.

5 posted on 11/30/2005 5:34:21 AM PST by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AbeKrieger
Was it a bomb, or a sharp object, that enabled the events of 9/11?

The proximate cause was a sharp object, but the underlying cause was that passengers weren't (and still aren't) allowed to carry licensed firearms on board. Change that rule and nobody will ever again hijack an aircraft with a box cutter.

6 posted on 11/30/2005 5:34:25 AM PST by TheGhostOfTomPaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: zeke15

"Scissors? Did someone say scissors would be allowed again?"
7 posted on 11/30/2005 5:35:20 AM PST by shezza (71 days)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neodad
I suggest everyone arm themselves with scissors.

Would-be Terrorists in Mexican Standoff with Airline Passengers Carrying Rock, Paper

8 posted on 11/30/2005 5:35:56 AM PST by TheGhostOfTomPaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Only if you have already been trained in how to overcome an assailant armed with a banana.


9 posted on 11/30/2005 5:38:47 AM PST by Buck W. (Yesterday's Intelligentsia are today's Irrelevantsia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: zeke15

Is this such a dumb idea. The first guy that stands up with a pair of boxcutters and says 'I'm taking over this plane' is getting the bum rush by me and everyone else in coach. Good luck stopping all of us. I'll have my newly decriminalized nail clippers at the ready.


10 posted on 11/30/2005 5:39:05 AM PST by Steel Wolf (* No sleep till Baghdad! *)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zeke15
... under four inches long tools shorter than seven inches.

No comment.

11 posted on 11/30/2005 5:40:24 AM PST by COUNTrecount
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zeke15

It looks like we have learned NOTHING from 9/11. The borders are wide open, and we are relaxing any security measures that were deemed important. How can these measures now be relaxed? Did al-qaeda give up?


12 posted on 11/30/2005 5:40:56 AM PST by mirkwood (Atlantic Brewing Company)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheGhostOfTomPaine

I thought the suggestion that the airlines put a 12" metal bar in every seat-back pocket had promise.


13 posted on 11/30/2005 5:41:16 AM PST by Oztrich Boy (Paging Nehemiah Scudder:the Crazy Years are peaking. America is ready for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: zeke15

Sounds sensible to me. Nowadays, any hijackers with boxcutters would be ripped apart by the other passengers. Nailcutters and other small sharp objects should be allowed in bags.


14 posted on 11/30/2005 5:41:58 AM PST by dinodino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheGhostOfTomPaine

Then again, sharp objects don't hijack planes, militant muslims do. Neither should be on a U.S. flight.


15 posted on 11/30/2005 5:44:52 AM PST by AbeKrieger (Islam is the virus that causes al-Qaeda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Dagnabbit. I still won't be able to fly anywhere.


16 posted on 11/30/2005 5:44:55 AM PST by swain_forkbeard (Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: dinodino

No, that wouldn't happen. If they cut someone's throat there would be mass shock. I just don't get this ruling...its just not making any sense.


17 posted on 11/30/2005 5:45:25 AM PST by Recovering Ex-hippie (Cowards cut and run...Marines never do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Steel Wolf
Is this such a dumb idea. The first guy that stands up with a pair of boxcutters and says 'I'm taking over this plane' is getting the bum rush by me and everyone else in coach. Good luck stopping all of us. I'll have my newly decriminalized nail clippers at the ready.

I really don't think they should prevent any small personal weapon-like devices on planes anymore. I just don't see the point now.

Sorry for all you hijackers that just want to go to Cuba, but now I'm going to assume any hijacked plane ends up on the side of a building. Therefore, I have nothing to lose by taking several bullets from your Uzi on the way to stopping you. You may kill some of us passengers, but damned if we're going down without a fight.
18 posted on 11/30/2005 5:45:42 AM PST by beezdotcom (Xenalyte has posted! Please observe five seconds of respectful silence.....thank you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount
... tools shorter than seven inches.

Hey, enough with the racial profiling ! (there's a joke in there)

19 posted on 11/30/2005 5:46:07 AM PST by AbeKrieger (Islam is the virus that causes al-Qaeda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: zeke15

Gee the TSA can't profile passengers to weed out possible terrorists yet shakes down little old ladies in walkers and Congressional Medal of Honor winners and gropes young females and now plans to allow passengers to bring scissors and "small" knives aboard. Why bother screening at all?...its become a joke.


20 posted on 11/30/2005 5:46:32 AM PST by The Great RJ ("Mir wölle bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy
I thought the suggestion that the airlines put a 12" metal bar in every seat-back pocket had promise.

That's not a bad idea, but I'd prefer a handgun with instructions for use. In fact, I'd love to see the presentation by the flight attendants: "In case of a highjacking, please remove the handgun from the seatback in front of you and insert the cartridge as Debbie is now demonstrating . . . "

(And you're right, we are overdue for Nehemiah Scudder. Could RAH have been that wrong?)

21 posted on 11/30/2005 5:47:56 AM PST by TheGhostOfTomPaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: dinodino
Sounds sensible to me. Nowadays, any hijackers with boxcutters would be ripped apart by the other passengers. Nailcutters and other small sharp objects should be allowed in bags.

On Fox this morning, they commented that in the event of a high-jacking with sharp objects, the pilot would be able to land the plane because of the secured cockpit door but back in the cabin, the aisle would run with blood. My immediate thought was that the only blood in the aisle will be that flowing from the unrecognizable remains of the unfortunate schmuck who thought it would be a good idea to threaten a plane load of American passengers post 9/11.

22 posted on 11/30/2005 5:48:51 AM PST by Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: mirkwood
How can these measures now be relaxed?

This was just meaningless window dressing. 9/11 happened because no one expected that anyone would be crazy enough to intentionally fly a loaded passenger jet into a building. The next time someone tries to hijack an aircraft with box cutters, they are going to be shredded and tossed out an airlock. If anything, this change will improve security.
23 posted on 11/30/2005 5:49:04 AM PST by ARCADIA (Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Recovering Ex-hippie
No, that wouldn't happen. If they cut someone's throat there would be mass shock. I just don't get this ruling...its just not making any sense.

I think you overestimate the 'mass shock', and underestimate some of your fellow passengers.

A great many of us fools tend to rush in where angels fear to tread - I say this, not because I'm particularly brave, but because I already know that I react to dangerous situations with anger, and not a lot of thought. Therefore, I'm probably not the guy you want next to you at a bank robbery - but in a hijack situation where the assumption is that we'll probably all end up splattered into a building, it's useful.
24 posted on 11/30/2005 5:52:40 AM PST by beezdotcom (Xenalyte has posted! Please observe five seconds of respectful silence.....thank you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: TheGhostOfTomPaine

"The proximate cause was a sharp object, but the underlying cause was that passengers weren't (and still aren't) allowed to carry licensed firearms on board. Change that rule and nobody will ever again hijack an aircraft with a box cutter."

I am a big supporter of the second ammendment, but I don't want guns on planes. I'd imagine terrorists would be in favor of this possibility. All they'd need to do is buy up ten or twelve seats, and have everyone out gunned. I doubt very many passengers would bring guns, so i'd wouldn't be very hard.


25 posted on 11/30/2005 5:52:59 AM PST by SmoothTalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: zeke15
***Sharp Objects May Be Allowed on Planes***

About time. I hate leaving my Bowie knife at home.

26 posted on 11/30/2005 5:54:02 AM PST by Condor51 (Leftists are moral and intellectual parasites - Standing Wolf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmoothTalker
I am a big supporter of the second ammendment, but I don't want guns on planes. I'd imagine terrorists would be in favor of this possibility. All they'd need to do is buy up ten or twelve seats, and have everyone out gunned. I doubt very many passengers would bring guns, so i'd wouldn't be very hard.

That's a good point, but I still think the deterrent effect alone would generally prevent the scenario you envision. Highjackers don't want to get shot (and even the ones who want to fly planes into buildings don't want to get killed before they can do it). Even if there were a dozen or more highjackers/terrorists, each one of them would be risking death if even one other passenger were carrying. (As you probably know, the deterrent effect of concealed-carry laws works on the same principle: probably most people are not in fact carrying concealed weapons, but anyone might be.)

27 posted on 11/30/2005 5:57:48 AM PST by TheGhostOfTomPaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: zeke15

So now Al Franken's head and Ann Coulter's tongue will be allowed on board flights. :-D


28 posted on 11/30/2005 5:59:38 AM PST by DaveLoneRanger (Celebrating my first full year on FR! Has it been one year already?? Has it only been one year??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zeke15

This whole thing has always been a joke. Although one was not allowed to bring nail clippers -- metal pens (steel Mont Blanc for example) and credit cards (which can be sharpened) have never been banned and have a far more destructive potential. Finally, after years of martial arts training if someone were to stick a box cutter in my face I would stick it somewhere far more distasteful on their person.


29 posted on 11/30/2005 6:07:26 AM PST by Cicero5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount
... under four inches long tools shorter than seven inches.
No comment.

Damn, I can't fly now...

30 posted on 11/30/2005 6:08:40 AM PST by BlueMondaySkipper (The quickest way of ending a war is to lose it. - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Hey, I want to know if they will let me bring on my size 000 knitting needles. Pointy sticks made of steel....


31 posted on 11/30/2005 6:08:49 AM PST by Knitting A Conundrum (Act Justly, Love Mercy, and Walk Humbly With God Micah 6:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AbeKrieger
The reasoning is that such items are no longer regarded as the greatest threat to airline security. Ahh I get it...no longer the greatest threat... In other news, bailiffs nationwide are now allowing switchblades into courtrooms because...well they're just more concerned with handguns. Um, shouldn't "security" be eliminating ANY potential threat???
32 posted on 11/30/2005 6:09:40 AM PST by zeke15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AbeKrieger
***I miss the point of this. Was it a bomb, or a sharp object, that enabled the events of 9/11?***

Good question and point.
They had stinking little utility knives (aka 'box cutters'), BUT they also had boxes which allegedly held bombs.

And IIRC, on flight 93 over PA they realized there wasn't any bomb.

An aside, no terrorist with a 'sharpened object' will ever be able to hijack a plane again. Not in the USA anyway.

33 posted on 11/30/2005 6:12:02 AM PST by Condor51 (Leftists are moral and intellectual parasites - Standing Wolf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AbeKrieger

"Then again, sharp objects don't hijack planes, militant Muslims do. Neither should be on a U.S. flight."

Now you're talking. Lets get to the heart of the problem. Our first enemy is Muslims; a close second is Political Correctness.


34 posted on 11/30/2005 6:17:48 AM PST by RoadTest (Margaret Thatcher gave the best definition of "consensus": Lack of leadership.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: dinodino
"Nowadays, any hijackers with boxcutters would be ripped apart by the other passengers."

Exactly. The enabling factor in 9/11 was the training we have all received for a situation like that, which is to be quiet and give them what they want. I guess it works out if you are in a 7-11 being robbed, but in this case it was exactly what the hijackers had planned for. The whole tightened airport security thing after 9/11 was a farce and completely unnecessary. Now that the paradigm shift has occurred, I doubt that 9/11 could be carried out with M16s, let alone box cutters.
35 posted on 11/30/2005 6:19:48 AM PST by beef (Who Killed Kennewick Man?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Knitting A Conundrum
Hey, I want to know if they will let me bring on my size 000 knitting needles. Pointy sticks made of steel....

Knitting needles are still verbotten. Can't have some granny knitting an Afghan.

36 posted on 11/30/2005 6:20:31 AM PST by VRWCmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember

But they will let you crochet one...I could do more damage with a smaller crochet hook than with knitting needles, but they don't seem to realize that.


37 posted on 11/30/2005 6:23:02 AM PST by Knitting A Conundrum (Act Justly, Love Mercy, and Walk Humbly With God Micah 6:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: mirkwood

If you are unable to open your complimentary pack of peanuts or sun-chips I'm sure the stewardess would do it for you after she pours your ginger ale...there's really no need for scissors...


38 posted on 11/30/2005 6:27:44 AM PST by zeke15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: neodad

Rock beats scissors.


39 posted on 11/30/2005 6:30:02 AM PST by ops33 (Retired USAF Senior Master Sergeant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: zeke15

I'll use the Bowie knife I brought onto the plane, thanks.


40 posted on 11/30/2005 6:30:52 AM PST by dinodino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Steel Wolf
You are absolutely right. I have a very good friend who oversees training programs for the TSA at a midwestern airport. Both he and I agree that a 9/11 type of takeover of an airliner will never happen again. If it was tried the passengers would revolt and try and take back the airliner from the terrorists. The terrorists will not repeat that strategy again but come up with something new.
41 posted on 11/30/2005 6:32:48 AM PST by ops33 (Retired USAF Senior Master Sergeant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: zeke15
I saw some composite polymer knives last weekend that had blades sharp enough to slit a throat.

How does the TSA plan on checking for these?

42 posted on 11/30/2005 6:37:12 AM PST by Rebelbase (Food stamps, section-8, State paid Child support, etc. pay more than the min. wage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering Ex-hippie
If they cut someone's throat there would be mass shock.

I think you need to work on your "recovery" a little more. There was no "mass shock" on Flight 93. The difference between that flight and the other three was that they knew what the intentions of the hijackers was. In a post-911 world, there will never again be an airplane hijacked with any weapon, for any reason. Now we have to worry about bombs, not hijackers.

43 posted on 11/30/2005 6:46:33 AM PST by NonZeroSum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: zeke15
Sharp Objects May Be Allowed on Planes

Dull objects will still be allowed.

Dull objects like TSA employees.

44 posted on 11/30/2005 6:47:51 AM PST by Lazamataz (When life gives you lemons, kick it in the shins and take its wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheGhostOfTomPaine

"That's a good point, but I still think the deterrent effect alone would generally prevent the scenario you envision. Highjackers don't want to get shot (and even the ones who want to fly planes into buildings don't want to get killed before they can do it). Even if there were a dozen or more highjackers/terrorists, each one of them would be risking death if even one other passenger were carrying. (As you probably know, the deterrent effect of concealed-carry laws works on the same principle: probably most people are not in fact carrying concealed weapons, but anyone might be.)
"

I don't think the islamic crazies care about that. They'd just pack a plane. They wouldn't care if they lost one or two hijackers, because they come from a culture of death and were aiming to die for Allah anyway.


45 posted on 11/30/2005 6:48:58 AM PST by SmoothTalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: zeke15

they are thinking of the people who use scissors for medical reasons.

people like my family


46 posted on 11/30/2005 6:50:52 AM PST by wallcrawlr (http://www.bionicear.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmoothTalker

Ever since 9/11, I have suggested a Federal Concealed Carry program, where people who already have CCW permits in their state could apply for certification. After a background check and an air-specific training class, they would be allowed to carry on board airliners.

This would prevent any bozo trying to hijack an airplane with a sharp object.

There will never be enough "air marshals" to protect every flight. Plus, they are easily spotted, due to their silly attire requirements. With a CCW program, no one would know who was armed, which would pretty much remove airliners as a potential target for terrorism.


47 posted on 11/30/2005 7:00:10 AM PST by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: wallcrawlr

They are? The article makes no mention of doing this for people who need scissors for medical reasons, it says they're doing it b/c explosives are a greater threat. If someone needs to bring something on a plane for medical reasons I'm sure they can make special arrangements. That doesn't mean they need to allow anyone to bring sharp objects on board...


48 posted on 11/30/2005 7:00:22 AM PST by zeke15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: SmoothTalker

They can't play it that way; they don't know if 1, 5 or 50 passengers are armed.

And "packing a plane" would rather defeat their purpose, wouldn't it?


49 posted on 11/30/2005 7:02:41 AM PST by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: zeke15

the article may not mention it but the TSA intends it.

I am doubly sure becuase we just traveled last week, the bag was identified via x-ray, they searched the kit and confirmed the scissors, then the fella spoke to me of the new reg's and that if I ever had a prob to make sure the screeners understood they are for med reasons and speak to a supervisor if I have too.

the scissors we use have a rounded tip.

i dont know the details if they had a pointed end.


50 posted on 11/30/2005 7:10:02 AM PST by wallcrawlr (http://www.bionicear.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson