I fail to see the problem as long as it's aimed at the Islamazi side only. If there's going to be collateral damage from Katyushas or Qassams...let it fall on them! Also, consider that 1.25 miles a no-mans land kill zone that would be VERY obvious to the PaleSimian side....they were the reason it happened, they bear the consequences
And a barrage would be a problem for the unit.
I suggest multiple overlap units with a secondary command/radar vehicle operating to it's rear...kinda like an AWACS. If there were 3 or 4 units per sector, mobile to respond to "Intel" in certain areas, all the better!
The islamokazis would march a couple busloads into a firing lane of a Phalanx and then rain down Qassams between the Phalanx and the launchers / children so they'd be mowed down to get more world "opinion" and then declare them "martyrs".
And this is bad....why? Again....I do not differentiate between PaleSimian kids and Terrorists, since they don't either! A kid or a mom with an explosives belt is just the same as what the VC did in 'Nam with the "shoeshine" boxes and moms with grenades attached to their kids!
A blatant "kill zone" of security would do WONDERS for a peacful border
If this sounds cold...sorry...it's World War III/IV, and the enemy is setting the playing field. Hell, Israel would be accused of killing them no matter what they did! In my version, they don't climb back into the cofffins during the press show funeral!