Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pyro7480

I wondered why they were bothering with a diesel.

I was thinking home port protection, but you are probably correct.


3 posted on 12/01/2005 10:53:02 AM PST by MeanWestTexan (Many at FR would respond to Christ "Darn right, I'll cast the first stone!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: MeanWestTexan

I think the Russian still use Kilos, so it wouldn't surprise me that they would use this new model too. Diesel-electrics are good for "choke point" situations, like the entrance to the Black Sea, for example.


5 posted on 12/01/2005 10:56:53 AM PST by Pyro7480 (Sancte Joseph, terror daemonum, ora pro nobis!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: MeanWestTexan
Diesel-electric subs have the advantage of running extremely quietly because you don't need the noisy pump systems for cooling a nuclear reactor; however, there is the major disadvantage of limited running time under water. Mind you, the Seawolf and Virginia class nuclear subs have highly-insulated reactor sections, which also drastically reduces the noise signature of the submarine.
9 posted on 12/01/2005 11:52:30 AM PST by RayChuang88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson