Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Britain to start all children with phonics
UPI ^ | 12/1/2005

Posted on 12/01/2005 4:25:16 PM PST by ncountylee

LONDON, Dec. 1 (UPI) -- Starting next year, all British school children will learn to read using the traditional technique known as synthetic phonics.

A report released Thursday said that, by the age of 11, children taught by the phonics method are typically three years ahead of others in reading ability. Jim Rose, a former director of the Office of Standards in Education and the report's author, also found that synthetic phonics works best when used alone and not in a combination of methods, the Times of London reported.

Rose recommended that children be taught nothing but phonics until they are 5, followed by a rich exposure to language. Under the present system, phonics is combined with the "look and say" method where whole words are taught.

"I am going to adopt the recommendations in this report to make sure that synthetic phonics is taught systematically and early in British schools as quickly as possible," Education Secretary Ruth Kelly said in a BBC interview.

END


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: earlychildhood; education; language; literacy; phonics
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

1 posted on 12/01/2005 4:25:16 PM PST by ncountylee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ncountylee

There goes spelling.


2 posted on 12/01/2005 4:26:00 PM PST by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee
Rose recommended that children be taught nothing but phonics until they are 5

Seems like an awfully early cutoff, to me.

3 posted on 12/01/2005 4:27:41 PM PST by Tax-chick ("You don't HAVE to be a fat pervert to speak out about eating too much and lack of morals." ~ LG)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee
A report released Thursday said that, by the age of 11, children taught by the phonics method are typically three years ahead of others in reading ability. Jim Rose, a former director of the Office of Standards in Education and the report's author, also found that synthetic phonics works best when used alone and not in a combination of methods, the Times of London reported.

This is a proven method of instruction. California threw this out years ago, and the children there paid for it....dearly. In standardized tests, after using the "whole language method" California children scored lowest in the entire nation, scoring above only Guam.

But the NEA and other liberals keep pushing the "whole language" guessing approach anyways.

4 posted on 12/01/2005 4:28:23 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee

Excellent. There's nothing more pathetic than watching an adult try to figure out what a word is, when they haven't been taught phonics.

Kids that are taught phonics are sounding out difficult words and reading easily a lot earlier than other kids.

Why it was ever stopped, I can't imagine.


5 posted on 12/01/2005 4:31:09 PM PST by DoughtyOne (MSM: Public support for war waining. 403/3 House vote against pullout vaporizes another lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee

So, how does one use phonics to pronounce "drought", "nought", "worchestershire" and "colour"?


6 posted on 12/01/2005 4:31:55 PM PST by LexBaird (tyrannosaurus Lex, unapologetic carnivore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo

Whole Language is a joke. It teaches "creative spelling" rather than just teaching kids that there is a right and wrong way to spell. Heaven forbid we damage their self-esteem. I taught Language Arts in AZ for 7 years during the height of the whole language movement. I hated it, and was very happy when my principal took it upon himself to switch to a phonics-based program.


7 posted on 12/01/2005 4:37:00 PM PST by rampage8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LexBaird

It's doesn't matter since no one on the face of the earth knows how to pronounce "worchestershire".


8 posted on 12/01/2005 4:37:40 PM PST by mtbopfuyn (Legality does not dictate morality... Lavin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee

Fantastic news!


9 posted on 12/01/2005 4:38:10 PM PST by mtbopfuyn (Legality does not dictate morality... Lavin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee

I took fonix fo 5 yerz and I spel gude.


10 posted on 12/01/2005 4:38:32 PM PST by Conservomax (There are no solutions, only trade-offs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rampage8

So WONDERFUL to hear you say that! There's hope!!

Half-way through Kindergarten, my daughter hadn't even learned all her letters, much less how to read. They spent all their time on self-esteem group therapy type of crap and 'reading' lines like "Brown bear, brown bear what do you see....I see Susie looking at me" ad nauseum. It was absurd!

I pulled her out of school and home schooled her from January to June. She learned to read, perfectly, by the end of February....and was ahead of most students in every class in her reading abilities (and therefore, in learning other subjects) for the rest of her school years.

I'm also very glad that at least Governor Gray Davis did something right in California....forcing all teachers to go back to teaching at least SOME phonics instruction (after seeing how badly, year after year, the children in that state did on reading tests).


11 posted on 12/01/2005 4:43:12 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Conservomax

Eye took hole languige trayning, and eye can rite reelly wel.


12 posted on 12/01/2005 4:43:51 PM PST by quark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee
I here fonix is gud.
13 posted on 12/01/2005 4:44:55 PM PST by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee
There goes spelling.

I learned to read with nothing but phonics. I'll take you on in spelling contest anytime, anywhere.

14 posted on 12/01/2005 4:45:08 PM PST by Bernard Marx (Don't make the mistake of interpreting my Civility as Servility)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee

Phonics?????

Why???????????

Can't EVERYONE memorize 100,000 words so they can read the 'whole language' method?


15 posted on 12/01/2005 4:45:12 PM PST by Balding_Eagle (God has blessed Republicans with really stupid enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bernard Marx

You would win.


16 posted on 12/01/2005 4:48:13 PM PST by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: LexBaird

You forgot the great George Bernard Shaw's speeling of FISH
GHOTI


17 posted on 12/01/2005 4:48:55 PM PST by sinbad17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mtbopfuyn; Flyer
It's doesn't matter since no one on the face of the earth knows how to pronounce "worchestershire".

Some folks even claim that woostesher sauce has anchovies in it.

18 posted on 12/01/2005 4:51:24 PM PST by humblegunner (If you're gonna die, die with your boots on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LexBaird

"So, how does one use phonics to pronounce "drought", "nought", "worchestershire" and "colour"?"

You learn them the way you learn an idiomatic expression - by exposure. And memorization; those words are exceptions.

My daughter was taught exclusively with "look and say" and it held her back immeasurably. Straight phonics is the way to go, IMHO.


19 posted on 12/01/2005 4:53:01 PM PST by StatenIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee
Everyone here is a little right and a little wrong and it all boils down to how you define reading. If you see reading as merely being the ability to put sound to symbols then phonics is a good choice; however, if you define reading as I do "the ability to unite sound with the appropriate symbols in order to derive understanding of a communique" then no one method is adequate.
20 posted on 12/01/2005 4:59:21 PM PST by sinbad17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson