Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Walgreen Disciplines 4 Pharmacists (Religious Rights Alert!)
CBS ^ | November 30, 2005

Posted on 12/02/2005 8:56:52 AM PST by NYer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-208 next last
To: NYer; All
Walgreen policy says pharmacists can refuse to fill prescriptions to which they are morally opposed, except where state law prohibits, but they must take steps to have the prescription filled by another pharmacist or store, Bruce said.

It's the state, not Walgreen's that you should be directing your anger to, people...

21 posted on 12/02/2005 9:08:56 AM PST by mwyounce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer; aomagrat; GipperCT; MarMema; crazykatz; don-o; JosephW; lambo; MoJoWork_n; newberger; ...

Walgreen's isn't to blame here as they are following the laws of the land.

Rod Blagojevich, however, who claims to be an Eastern Orthodox Christian, is to blame. I've got to find out what Archdiocese he claims to belong to and start pushing for a public excommunication!


22 posted on 12/02/2005 9:08:56 AM PST by FormerLib (Kosova: "land stolen from Serbs and given to terrorist killers in a futile attempt to appease them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JamesP81

> if everyone did this and half the nation's pharmacists quit their jobs that could cause some difficulties, to say the least.

Agreed. Because then the postal workers would refuse to drop mail off at the homes of pharmacists who quit their jobs and thus denied the postal worker's wife the pain meds she needs, and so on...


23 posted on 12/02/2005 9:10:38 AM PST by orionblamblam ("You're the poster boy for what ID would turn out if it were taught in our schools." VadeRetro)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: indcons
There is no "religious rights" stuff involved here.

There sure as heck is!

If the pharmacists didn't like the rules, they shouldn't have worked there in the first place.

The rule was that they could be pharmacists and follow their conscience -- until Gov. Blagojevich declared it illegal.

By the logic used here, that catholic school that fired that out of wedlock, pregnant teacher (for breaking her contract) had no reason to do so either.

The logic is that the state shouldn't force private companies and organizations to do things against their religious beliefs.

24 posted on 12/02/2005 9:11:32 AM PST by JohnnyZ (Veterans' Day. Enough said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Go work for (or own) a pharmacy that shares your views. That about sums it up.

The Devil's Deacon jumps in on the side of Death.

I'm shocked, shocked!

25 posted on 12/02/2005 9:12:55 AM PST by JohnnyZ (Veterans' Day. Enough said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan

That's cool. And I can visit elsewhere. I love freedom.


26 posted on 12/02/2005 9:12:59 AM PST by gathersnomoss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; Ed_NYC; MonroeDNA; widgysoft; Springman; Timesink; dubyaismypresident; Grani; coug97; ...
Sorry - if you work for a private concern (i.e., Walgreens in this case), you have an obligation to do what the job requires.

If you find you can't (whether for religious or any other reason), there are plenty of people who WILL do the job, despite Vicente Fox's admonition otherwise.

If you can't/won't do the job, then you need to find another job or employer.

Period.

Just damn.

If you want on the list, FReepmail me. This IS a high-volume PING list...

27 posted on 12/02/2005 9:14:10 AM PST by mhking (The world needs a wake up call gentlemen...we're gonna phone it in.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan

I have to agree... and then we have the right of boycott.

That's the free market.


28 posted on 12/02/2005 9:14:17 AM PST by VictoryGal (Never give up, never surrender!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mhking
Sorry - if you work for a private concern (i.e., Walgreens in this case), you have an obligation to do what the job requires.

You support the governor forcing pharmacists to dispense abortion drugs?

29 posted on 12/02/2005 9:16:31 AM PST by JohnnyZ (Veterans' Day. Enough said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Nihil Obstat
By this same logic, Target should be on your go-to list. In contrast to Walgreen's, Target has refused to require that its pharmacists fill prescriptions for emergency contraceptives if the pharmacist feels such an act conflicts with his religious beliefs.

Planned Parenthood is in a tizzy over this! So go to Target. No, they've banned bell ringers (or is it the word "Christmas"?).

What ever happened to the mom and pop drugstores???

30 posted on 12/02/2005 9:18:40 AM PST by King of Florida
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ

> Walgreens has offered the pharmacists jobs in Missouri, which isn't completely obsessed with killing babies.

Sounds like they are hogtied by the law and are attempting to make things right.

I'll continue to shop there.. They're much better than Longs Drugs, which is a dump and has gotten my prescription wrong at least once.


31 posted on 12/02/2005 9:18:51 AM PST by VictoryGal (Never give up, never surrender!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: NYer
A rule imposed by Gov. Rod Blagojevich in April

I didn't know that IL was now a dictatorship.

I hope Dear Leader Blogojevich doesn't outlaw cheese or Episcopalianism tomorrow on a whim.

32 posted on 12/02/2005 9:19:55 AM PST by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ
You support the governor forcing pharmacists to dispense abortion drugs?

I support following the law and the dictates of your employer.

If an individual has such a strong ideology that would prohibit him from doing so (especially knowing the situation in advance), then that individual needs to find an employer who will be more in line with those ideologies.

33 posted on 12/02/2005 9:19:58 AM PST by mhking (The world needs a wake up call gentlemen...we're gonna phone it in.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: VictoryGal
Walgreens has offered the pharmacists jobs in Missouri, which isn't completely obsessed with killing babies.

On second thought, that's a good point. Walgreen's really isn't the culprit here after all. It's the state government.
34 posted on 12/02/2005 9:21:02 AM PST by JamesP81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ

"The logic is that the state shouldn't force private companies and organizations to do things against their religious beliefs."

I am personally dead against the morning-after pill.....however, these employees were being paid to do their job. They signed employment contracts with the company and the company has every right to fire them for breaking it.

BTW, I don't see how the state is forcing "private companies and organizations to do things against their religious beliefs" in this case.


35 posted on 12/02/2005 9:21:10 AM PST by indcons (Don't question either my intelligence or my ability; I have none.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: NYer

The day is one day approaching when pharmacists may be asked to dispence suicide cocktails. Should the religious beliefs of the pharmacists also be ignored in this case, as the amoral morons demand?


36 posted on 12/02/2005 9:21:48 AM PST by FormerACLUmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ
The logic is that the state shouldn't force private companies and organizations to do things against their religious beliefs.

Walgreen's is free to refuse to sell the drug. They chose not to.

The pharmacists are free to take their services elsewhere. There is a HUGE need for pharmacists, all over.

They should find a pharmacy whose inventory better reflects their religious views.

37 posted on 12/02/2005 9:22:11 AM PST by sinkspur (Trust, but vilify.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan
The market will resolve.

Indeed. There are those who will boycott those stores. I support that right (and to be more realistic, responsibility). But the pharmacists in question knew the situation prior to their actions. They have to deal with the repercussions of their actions. If it means they can't work for Walgreens' any more, then they need to find another employer.

38 posted on 12/02/2005 9:22:19 AM PST by mhking (The world needs a wake up call gentlemen...we're gonna phone it in.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice

He/she doesn't have to do it...but the store manager better find someone else who can. What if a Jehovah's Witness Pharmacist refused to sell anyone aspirin?


39 posted on 12/02/2005 9:22:49 AM PST by Dallas59 (“You love life, while we love death"( Al-Qaeda & Democratic Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mhking
If an individual has such a strong ideology that would prohibit him from doing so (especially knowing the situation in advance), then that individual needs to find an employer who will be more in line with those ideologies.

The employer's not the problem. It's the state that's causing the problem.

I support following the law and the dictates of your employer.

Just because someone declared it to be legal doens't mean it's moral.
40 posted on 12/02/2005 9:23:13 AM PST by JamesP81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-208 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson