Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/02/2005 1:35:46 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: nickcarraway

I don't even have a tv.


2 posted on 12/02/2005 2:01:54 PM PST by Kirkwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Best explanation I've heard on this yet! IOW, it's not a bad idea to pick up one of the bargain TVs out there -- as low as $97 for a 20" analog. It will still work in 2009, one way or the other. It's probably even smarter to wait till this chip is factory installed on the analog sets, although the prices may rise appreciably.

Do I understand it now?


3 posted on 12/02/2005 2:28:36 PM PST by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Congress desperately wants to make this transition happen, if only because the vacated analog TV channels will be auctioned by the federal government for an estimated $30 billion -- a significant cash infusion in this era of soaring deficits.

Will the 30 Billion materialize out of thin air, or will it be a hidden tax paid by those using services in the opened up frequencies?

4 posted on 12/02/2005 2:52:18 PM PST by Mark was here (How can they be called "Homeless" if their home is a field?.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
I'm reminded of when color TV came in. The signal was designed so that it could be received on the millions of existing black & white TVs as B&W. Within about 3 years, all those B&W TVs were scrapped and replaced with color TVs. Now, about 40 years later, we are still stuck with a system that was designed to be compatible with TVs that have been in the landfill for nearly 40 years. I hope they don't screw up digital TV the same way.
7 posted on 12/02/2005 3:15:55 PM PST by JoeFromSidney (My book is out. Read excerpts at www.thejusticecooperative.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
digital broadcasts look much better than analog even after conversion for viewing on non-high definition TVs, somewhat like the difference between DVDs and VHS tapes.

Written by someone who either has poor vision or lack of visual discrimination. The highly compressed digital signals that are being sent from cable and satellite providers make pix that are filled with artifacts. Yuck.

A strong analog signal will beat those pix any day. Now a full bandwidth uncompressed HD pix will blow you away, it's so stunning. But what's actually being delivered to homes is lousy.

10 posted on 12/02/2005 3:24:31 PM PST by savedbygrace (SECURE THE BORDERS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Digital signal, 400 channels, living colour, surround sound, and still nothing on...


15 posted on 12/02/2005 4:19:22 PM PST by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Last month, the Senate set a deadline of April 7, 2009, for the analog shutdown.

I suppose I'm not the first to notice that this date is almost as far away from any election as possible. The technology is there to do it today but that might get a few of the CongressCritters in hot water. And how would you like to be running for President with 50,000,000 screaming TeeeeVeeee fans rioting in the streets.

What a world we live in.

36 posted on 12/03/2005 5:17:36 AM PST by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson