Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SALChamps03
You're right. My brother asked me that the other morning........ and I said first place. Yoi!

Neverlheless, the point I was trying to make with that question was that there is always going to be someone to take this sicko terrorist's place................ until they are all eating 72 old grapes.

18 posted on 12/03/2005 9:55:47 AM PST by beyond the sea (Murtha: Redeployment - What .......Surrender? // “Victory is not a strategy”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: beyond the sea

More meaningful would be how many terrorists are eliminated versus how many terrorists still remain. The equation studied in differential equations that predicts population over time would then be used to say when terrorism groups will finally reach zero population. If one terrorist of whatever rank is being eliminated every day, recruitment from young people is probably replacing the losses. The net effect would be reducing the mean age of terrorist group members rather than eliminating the groups. The constant military activity would also tend to drive the terrorists groups to lurking in remote and damp basements and caves rather than being more active in the general population.


22 posted on 12/03/2005 10:05:37 AM PST by RightWhale (Not transferable -- Good only for this trip)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson