Ping.
The Roman Catholic Church has noted a correlation of sufficient size that they are enabled to tell the "experts" to go jump in lake.
If you want on/off the ping list let me and little jeremiah know.
"Does the New York Times believe that this nation's largest and best-known pedophilia organization, the North American Man/Boy Love Association is comprised of heterosexuals?"
Actually, the homosexual lobby would absolutely have you believe this.
They dispute the data provided by Dr. Paul Cameron that showed homosexuals were 10X more likely to engage in pedophilia than heterosexuals. They dispute it because they say that just because a guy boinks a little boy does not make him homosexual.
Hello???
That's nice.
However, the victims have overwhelmingly been adolescent boys. That is not "pedophilia". That is Pederasty which, by definition, involves homosexual conduct.
Is this unnamed plurality of experts comprised of expert homosexual predators, expert supporters of homosexual predators or a combination of both?
-the MSM seems to ignore reality and choose delusion to support the delusional... The experts & the MSM are part of the problem.
The study results show overwhelming findings that objectively one must draw but only one legitimate conclusion -homosexual predation was the primary activity that the sexual abuse was evidenced...
Some argue that the homosexual acts were not homosexual because only children were physically or psychologically raped of their innocence -they have as yet no 'orientation' and or mature sexuality or that the subjective rainbow gender spectrum rather than the binary 'sex' is an appropriate sexual identifier (very similar to the abortion argument claiming a baby is but a lump of flesh)? Some argue that the homosexual acts were not done by homosexuals (as if homosexual activity that defines homosexuals somehow does not now define homosexuals)?
It is weird logic to ignore that which specifically differentiates those who suffer from the homosexual disorder that predisposes them to homosexual activity and or those that actually participate in the activity and argue that this has nothing to do with homosexuals and or homosexual activity?
Regardless the politically correct illogical argumentative gymnastics and contrived hoops that some may posit I jump through -I myself will remain standing on Terra firma --simply put, the discussion involves activity -the abuse a majority of which was homosexual -the study was objectively scientific -not subjectively politically correct -as such a homosexual act was categorized a homosexual act and same sex sexual activity was identified as such...
The homosexual disorder is objectively defined by a predisposition to the activity... Homosexual activity is objectively defined by the activity -not the cause -not the intent -not anything morally irrelevant... Homosexual activists may gnash their teeth all they want -the facts speak for themselves...
Some still choose to ignore the obvious -regardless, the ignorance and or denial in this area will be overcome in the Church -the only question is will secular society get a clue or will it continue with its head in the politically correct sands of moral relativism?
In summary, objectively as to the sexual abuse of children all that is known is the activity -objectively, the majority of activity was homosexual predation -period...
Small except:
The study produced some important findings about the nature of child sexual abuse in the Catholic Church.
- Unlike in the general population, more males than females were allegedly. In fact, there was a significant difference between genders, with four out of five alleged victims being male.
- The majority of alleged victims were post-pubescent, with only a small percentage of priests receiving allegations of abusing young children.
- The allegations of sexual abuse involved a variety of sexual acts, and most of the priests involved were alleged to have committed multiple acts per victim. Indeed, much of the sexual abuse reported involved serious sexual offenses.
- According to the allegations of sexual abuse, the most frequent context of the sexual incidents occurred during a social event. Additionally, many of the priests with allegations of abuse socialized with the family of the alleged victim.
- The most common place of occurrence was the residence of the priest though incidents of abuse allegedly occurred in a wide variety of locations.
I note again clearly that this study confirms what other also not overly publicized or widely known or acknowledged studies have found -homosexual predation...
How about the cause and effect connection between homosexual sodomy and the worldwide AIDS problem, which is costing billions of dollars and millions of lives? Aren't homosexual sodomites the root cause of the problem? Why doesn't Congress hold hearings about this, as a public health issue? It's more important than drug use by baseball players.
Cardinal Cottier:There is a word that is never used and that, however, is important when we see the work that priests do; it is the word "ephebophilia."
It is not pedophilia, which is attraction to small boys, but refers to attraction to adolescents. It is a very ambiguous and decisive age for every one. And I think it is a very extended form of homosexuality.
This is just a dishonest attempt to play loose with the facts. They are correct, not every homosexual is a pedophile, thus it does not "equate", however there is a strong correlation between homosexuals and pedophilia..thus the use of the statement in the article is dishonest. Hum...NYT dishonest...who would have thunk? Just another example of agenda driven reporting.
Experts told the Church that pedophilia can be cured in their treatment centers but homosexuality can't. The Church sent the priests to their treatment centers so obviously the perverts involved in sex then had to be homosexuals. The Church has figured out the difference.
Betcha that Bishop Sklystad is gay. Any takers?? Ther SHOULD have been a witch hunt YEARS ago....all this crap wouldn't have happened!
"There are many wonderful and excellent priests in the church who have a gay orientation, are chaste and celibate, and are very effective ministers of the Gospel. Witch hunts and gay-bashing have no place in the church."
This man is not morally fit to work for Roto-Rooter, much less to be a priest.
I suppose he could be so ignorant as to believe what he says, which would make him a dupe rather than a liar, but I doubt it.
The whole reason that "witch hunts" are thought to be bad is that we presume that there are no witches. If there actually were witches, working evil through spells and such, then a witch hunt would be a perfectly rational and good thing to have.
The difference is that there actually are homosexuals using their position as faithless priests to gain access to the rectums of their young parishoners. To label attempts to rid ourselves of these predators "witch hunts" is dishonest in the extreme.
I will be helping out Little Jeremiah with this ping list for a few days.