LOL, only a "newspaper" as corrupt as The New York Times could spin this collection of documents into another anti-Bush rant.
Even the LA Times has been forced to print at least SOME of the true contents of these documents. Even the Times Picayune did too.
The drop in circulation for the New York Times is not an accident, and will not reverse itself until they re-organize and finally start sticking to facts. Howard Dean gives me all the liberal rhetoric I need to hear. With agencies like CBS, the BBC, and The New York Times, I have a choice. I excercise that choice and tune them out, along with an increasing number of other people tuning them out every day they continue to inject their own agenda into the "news".
Frankly, I don't think they are going to "get it" until it is too late. Competition is the exercise of Darwin's Laws regarding survival of the fittest. The new media of the internet is more than supplying that competition, and old guards like The New York Times are working full tilt, directing every effort towards their own irrelevence and demise.
The Times Picayune broke this yesterday and did a pretty good job of exposing the Democrat conspiracy to blame Bush. Of course, the NY Times is a co-conspirator, so we shouldn't expect them to confess. They continue to demonstrate that the are the leading publication for the Joseph Goebbels School of Journalism.