Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: indcons

I have never watched Miss Katie, being highly allergic to "perky" and all, but is she really newscaster material? I thought she was just a mindless TV hosterette.


20 posted on 12/04/2005 3:22:31 PM PST by Theresawithanh (You'll get me to stop posting on FR when you wrench my laptop from my cold, dead fingers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Theresawithanh

well, as with all elitist libs, she "thinks" she's smart.

Katie is about as likeable as a planters wart.


22 posted on 12/04/2005 3:25:08 PM PST by conservativebabe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Theresawithanh
I thought she was just a mindless TV hosterette.

You got that right. I have to give Katie credit--she's fairly good doing interviews, from politicians to celebrities. But she would suck if she just sat behind a desk and read the news--that's what they pay Ann Curry for :)

25 posted on 12/04/2005 3:29:23 PM PST by silent_jonny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Theresawithanh
The ingnorance of those running CBS astounds me.

When Couric was hired to do the Today Show, ABC's Good Morning America was wining the ratings race.

After Deborah Norvel failed, it was decided that NBC would go after female viewers. The idea was to hire an attractive but quite aggressive female capable of dominateing both her male co-host and male guests. The idea was that a strong female would attract female viewers. It worked and still works to a degree. Katie of couse had taken the role to ideological extremes that has cost audience. Katie has feuded with male co-hosts and won. Men as a rule do not like Katie and her female appeal has declined as she has grown more aggressive and ideologically nasty.

But the dominate female role only works when she has a resisting male to best. A bullying Female is just a (word for female dog). Katie has forgotten how to win nicely. She can no longer attract a large female or male audiences. She is tending to alienate both. The role of interviewer is far different from news Anchor. She is and always was ill suited for an anchor position. Any skilled programmer ought to see that.

The problem with doing an anchor job on an evening news, as a (I will smile while I stab you in the back) female is her lack of trust. Viewers who do not see the world through her eyes will reject her. That is about 65 percent of the possible audience. She is at least as bad as Rather.

An anchor is supposed to tell the truth. To provide the information so that viewers can reach conclusions. That is what a majority of viewers want. Watch me use all the power of CBS to slay someone I don't like, will not garner male viewers. It will not garner female viewers. It will not garner viewers.

Katie Couric is going to make CBS long for the days of Connie Chung.


31 posted on 12/04/2005 3:39:57 PM PST by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Theresawithanh
I have never watched Miss Katie, being highly allergic to "perky" and all, but is she really newscaster material? I thought she was just a mindless TV hosterette.

I think being mindless is a requirement.

37 posted on 12/04/2005 3:44:59 PM PST by Temple Owl (Excelsior--Onward and Upward)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson