You can't read contextually, can you. This was for HIGHER VERTEBRATES. Remember that? Guess not.
This misbegotten effort by you to obfuscate your chalatan ways....is manifest. Your side is doing the hocus-pocus and to label Remine the "charlatan" is dishonesty on steroid. You are shown up when you misquote him this way. SO, wake up and smell the coffee.
And medved was the one always thumped on the Haldane Dilemma, not vice versa. Seems to me he did the same as you, misquoting.
So you are busted: All smoke, mirrors, bafflegab, distraction, and evasion.
Yup, that's you.
You can't read contextually, can you. This was for HIGHER VERTEBRATES. Remember that? Guess not.
Nobody rebutted by asking "What about bacteria?" Yes, higher vertebrates, slow reproduction. So what?
The rebuttals were that 1) the "cost of substitution" is less than Haldane figured," 2) Haldane's model was not allowing for the massive parallelism of substitutions in nature, and 3) ReMine was using a bad model to rebut a hard fact.
This misbegotten effort by you to obfuscate your chalatan ways....is manifest.
My irony meter is staring to overheat.
And medved was the one always thumped on the Haldane Dilemma, not vice versa. Seems to me he did the same as you, misquoting.
I have to my own knowledge misquoted no one. I mentioned medved merely as a poster who often trotted out ReMine on these threads. You have no basis that I can see for announcing that he has misquoted ReMine. If anyone at all has misquoted ReMine, I don't see it.
You're acting like a cornered rat.