NEW YORK GOP HAS BEEN INFORMED ABOUT THE HILLARY SENATE 2000 CAMPAIGN FINANCE FRAUD

phone discussion with NY GOP | 12-6-05 | dfu

[Alia]

Not even to mention how, as "First Lady", Hillary campaigned overseas, illegally, using her status as "first lady" when in fact she was using the "tools" of her office, in order to collect for her run as Senator. She got nailed on that. Newsmax reported. Hillary knew what she was doing, at the time. But she pled "the woman's line": "Why, I jest didn't know!" She knew exactly what she was doing. What a weak woman.

[PilloryHillary]

Bump!

http://www.peterfpaul.com

[jmaroneps37]

This is just more proof that Jeannine Pirro is not the candidate to beat the beast. Sh should have been jailed herself. She signed the very same fraudulent federal income tax returns that her husband did. He went to prison. She didn't. How does she bring up criminal activity by Hillary Clinton when she herself has this skeleton in her closet?
Answer: She can't.
She should just Disa-Piiro, run for AG, beat comrade Green and endorse John Spencer as the GOP's Senate candidate.

[doug from upland]

I understand that a judge made an unprecedented ruling that, despite her signature on the return, the fraud was committed by her husband without her knowledge.

[Jo Nuvark]

[...If Ramsey Clark is the best we have to offer, we are in deep doo doo...]

Or... Clark sincerely wants SM to be acquitted. I heard he volunteered.

[Just A Nobody]

My post:
If this is the best and brightest the GOP/Conservatives (and she is/claims to be both) have to offer, we are in deep doo doo.

I was referring to the second year law student.
Of course Clark volunteered. He always volunteers to destroy America.

[NotJustAnotherPrettyFace]

Do you honestly believe they didn't?? I knew and I've only been political for 20 months and on FR for a year.

And where did you hear about this? Right here on FR, no doubt. The MSM isn't covering it, that's for sure.

[Arizona]

"This is going to take a well-known reporter who wants to win a Pulitzer."

This is an excellent point - surely there must be one ambitious reporter out there who could handle this - you've provided all the background, links, etc.

"Bush's Justice Department is not ever going to go after Hillary."

So sad and so true. Besides the President's welcome to all illegals and ME coming through our borders, this is a rival 'hot issue' with me.

As always, thanks for all you do, Doug, it's much appreciated.

[Mia T]

"Bush's Justice Department is not ever going to go after Hillary."

 

December 7, 1941+64

Dear Concerned Americans,

Hillary Clinton's revisionist tome notwithstanding, 'living history' begets a certain symmetry. It is in that light that I make this not-so-modest proposal on this day, exactly 64 years after the attack on Pearl Harbor.

The context of our concern today--regardless of political affiliation--is Iraq and The War on Terror, but the larger fear is that our democracy may not survive. We have the requisite machines, power and know-how to defeat the enemy in Iraq and elsewhere, but do we have the will?

In particular, do we have the will to identify and defeat the enemy in our midst?

Answerable to no one, heir apparent in her own mind, self-serving in the extreme, Hillary Clinton incarnates this insidious new threat to our survival.

What we decide to do about Missus Clinton will tell us much about what awaits us in these perilous new times.

EXCERPT
COMPLETE LETTER

AN OPEN LETTER TO TIM ROBBINS, DAVID GEFFEN, CHRIS MATTHEWS, MAUREEN DOWD + JEANINE PIRRO
RE: a not-so-modest proposal concerning hillary clinton
Mia T
December 7, 1941+64

[Mia T]

bump

[Yellow Rose of Texas]

Thanks amom for the ping. Things move so slowly in the courts, I hope she, Hillary, does indeed testify in 2006 and not in 2007.