Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: johnnyb_61820

He is no doubt trying to limit the chances of being caught in his lie. The less he says, the better for him.


11 posted on 12/07/2005 7:01:40 AM PST by Emmett McCarthy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Emmett McCarthy
He is no doubt trying to limit the chances of being caught in his lie. The less he says, the better for him.

If this attack happened, Prof. Mirecki will lead the police to the exact spot, where they can examine physical evidence that may lead to the solution of the crime.

If this attack never happened, Prof. Mirecki will never lead them to an exact spot, because the police might be able to examine physical evidence and determine that no attack took place.

So, for my purposes, whether or not he leads the police to a specific location will be the best objective indicator of whether or not this attack took place. Until he does, this does not pass the sniff test.

15 posted on 12/07/2005 7:10:48 AM PST by gridlock (eliminate perverse incentives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson