[Mia T]

That's Katherine Prudhomme, an incredibly brave young woman.

The so-called journalists should listen carefully to Ms. Prudhomme's questioning of Gore. They should note, in particular, her brilliant use of the incredulous followup, which she deployed to great effect when Gore claimed not to have watched the Juanita Broaddrick interview concerning her rape by the clintons.

thanx to WorkingClassFilth for the video
special thanx to Jim Robinson

[bmwcyle]

bttt

[railsplitter]

I knew you had a MAC! ;o)

I just downloaded Quick Time to watch the Dateline interview.

[Mia T]

the clintons' documented abuse of women

[railsplitter]

Katherine Prudhomme does an excellent job in keeping Gore focused on the issue at hand. Gore is careful not to attack her overtly (as is their ways) but he often approaches the demarcation line, coming periously close to crossing it. Parse, parse, parse. I can't quite make out what she is asking Gore, in her last question to him. An excellent indictment of Gore (part and parcel to the Clinton syndicate) by his own mouth just the same. A good find!

If Gore had any class whatsoever, he would have given Bill Clinton an ultimatum, either Clinton resign, or he (Gore) would. Thankfully, he doesn't have that kind of class, and thankfully, he didn't resign, or otherwise Gore would have likely won in 1999, all the while being hailed as one righteous dude.

It isn't that our memories are fuzzy regarding the high crimes and midemeanors, owing to one, WJ Clinton, it's the overload by sheer volume of transgressions, attributable to one man (crime family). THAT is why your special skills on display at FR, and other places I hope, are sorely needed to remind us of the litany of transgressions that have been committed by this cabal, against our country.

[railsplitter]

I was a juror in a rape trial. The assailant had been incarcerated for 10 months. The defense attorney had prepared his client well, as did 10 months of thinking up answers to the pending questioning by the prosecution. There was always an answer for every question asked of him.

The prosecution's witnesses often told similar stories but never matching 100%. Usually, an answer would be said many ways and mean the same thing. One could see a common thread... no coaching. The defense attempted to exploit the slight discrepancies in their answers.

I see similarities to the witnesses statements from the rape trial I served on as a juror, and in both Juanita, and her friends statements, who corroborated her story. Dateline NBC is right to question the variances or missing pieces to the puzzle, but in totality, the statements speak to the truth. When an answer is unknown or a fuzzy recollection is offered as testimony, and it's received unvarnished from the author's mouth, intuitive reasoning by the viewer will determine if the statement(s) ring true or not. I believe Juanita.

It has been reported (source unknown) that as many as 75% of rapes go unreported. Of course they must be reported at some point to someone, for the statistics to be known.