Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Charles Henrickson

"Regardless of whether this was Christ's actual birthday, the symbolism works. And Christ's birth is inextricably linked to His resurrection."

Bingo. Christ's birth, Christ's resurrection and Christ's relationship with mankind is what matters. Who cares if we got the date right? I never remember my wife's, either!


29 posted on 12/07/2005 3:17:45 PM PST by Spok (Est omnis de civilitate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Spok; steve-b; Hoosier-Daddy; TexasGreg; Just mythoughts; mikeus_maximus; IronJack; george wythe; ..
Regardless of whether this was Christ's actual birthday, the symbolism works. And Christ's birth is inextricably linked to His resurrection.

That is the point of the article. Veith isn't saying with absolute certainty that December 25 was the actual date. (Note the "Regardless.") What he is saying is that the ancient belief about a death-date/conception-date congruence--in this case, a March 25 Crucifixion/Annunciation, making for a December 25 Nativity--works well theologically in connecting the Incarnation with the Passion of Our Lord. Furthermore, a December 25 date serves the theological point of the darkness not being able to overcome the Light of the World.

121 posted on 12/07/2005 9:03:59 PM PST by Charles Henrickson (Lutheran pastor and Ph.D. student in Biblical Studies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson