Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/09/2005 9:30:02 AM PST by blogblogginaway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: blogblogginaway

This is as specific as the briefing Bush received in August 2001 that the press insisted was the smoking gun proving Bush failed to prevent 9-11. Will they blame Clinton for not taking action to capture Bin Laden now?


2 posted on 12/09/2005 9:33:23 AM PST by saganite (The poster formerly known as Arkie 2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway
Interesting -- BTTT

Carolyn

3 posted on 12/09/2005 9:33:50 AM PST by CDHart (The world has become a lunatic asylum and the lunatics are in charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway

Whoa! Terrorists were targeting civilian airliners?? Shocking.


4 posted on 12/09/2005 9:34:25 AM PST by Lunatic Fringe (North Texas Solutions http://ntxsolutions.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway
Others include a highly classified President's Daily Brief report to former President Bill Clinton dated December 4, 1998, which was titled "Bin Ladin Preparing to Hijack US Aircraft and Other Attacks."

Bush didn't lie??? /Sarc

5 posted on 12/09/2005 9:36:07 AM PST by fanfan (" The liberal party is not corrupt " Prime Minister Paul Martin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway

I do not recall the 9/11 Commission making mention of this, did I miss it?


6 posted on 12/09/2005 9:36:38 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway
Others include a highly classified President's Daily Brief report to former President Bill Clinton dated December 4, 1998, which was titled "Bin Ladin Preparing to Hijack US Aircraft and Other Attacks."

And how many times did slick turn down a chance to take bin laden?

7 posted on 12/09/2005 9:37:07 AM PST by b4its2late (More Republicans in Congress need to grow a pair.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway

So Clinton, Not-so-bright and Burglar-man knew.


8 posted on 12/09/2005 9:37:12 AM PST by rod1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway

Memo must have fallen out of Sandy Burglar's socks.


9 posted on 12/09/2005 9:37:20 AM PST by Inwoodian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway

Gee, did the diseased looking Richard Clarke forget about this?

Could he apologize to me, the rest of America, and all the good people he slandered, for the fact he and his boss were incompetent?


10 posted on 12/09/2005 9:41:51 AM PST by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway

Maybe Clinton would have seen that memo if someone had taped it to the top of Monica's head.


12 posted on 12/09/2005 9:44:47 AM PST by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway
Bojinka
13 posted on 12/09/2005 9:46:12 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Monthly Donor spoken Here. Go to ... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway

So, did the Gorelick Wall go up after Clinton was informed?


15 posted on 12/09/2005 9:55:03 AM PST by airborne (Al-Queda can recruit on college campuses but the US military can't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway

I fully expect to see the MSM in wild paroxysms of outrage over the revelation that the Clinton administration had years of warnings about the potential threats Al Qaeda posed to civilian airliners. Those objective, hard-working MSM reporters will be all over this story, because they thought that the PDB of Aug. 6, 2001 should have put President Bush and than nation on red alert for hijacking threats, so we can be certain that the MSM will realize that 3+ years of similar knowledge should have allowed ample opportunity for the Clintonistas to act. I'm sure that we will soon see Richard Clarke, Joe Wilson, Wesley Clark, et al giving interviews to declare that Bill Clinton and Algore ignored these threats for years and bear a heavy responsibility for the weak security stance we displayed on 9/11.

Actually, it may be that the best chance of getting Bill Clinton's attention would have been to have Monica pass warnings from the CIA directly to the C-in-C.........


20 posted on 12/09/2005 10:07:15 AM PST by Enchante (Democrats: "We are ALL broken and worn out, our party & ideas, what else is new?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway
Others include a highly classified President's Daily Brief report to former President Bill Clinton dated December 4, 1998, which was titled "Bin Ladin Preparing to Hijack US Aircraft and Other Attacks." The CIA has also said it had told the Federal Aviation Administration in 1999 that "Osama bin Laden remains interested in targeting U.S. interests including on U.S. territory. He is well prepared to consider kidnappings and hijackings as well as bombings."

Unfortunately for America as a whole, we will NEVER hear this on any National News Program, except for perhaps Fox News. I imagine they could produce copies of the exact D.P.B, put them on TV and the simpleton lefties would still parse this into oblivion. It's almost 5 years later and the Clintons (yes they both ran the White House)continue to escape any blame for their Crime and Mis-Management against humanity YET AGAIN. The longer I live, the more I realize I live in a totally parallel world from The Left. What I mean is I've actually read books such as The Venona Secrets. I have one lefty friend who actually read the copy I gave him for Christmas a few years ago. Does anybody even believe the average Leftist Liberal can read a 600 page book nowadays? I'm sure he was the exception. LOL

23 posted on 12/09/2005 11:06:45 AM PST by Pagey (The Clintons ARE the true definition of the word WRETCHED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway

A lot of nothing. Everyobody has known since the 60's that civilian airliners are a primary target of terrorists. To say that Al-queada is targeting them is to say nothing more than that they are following in the steps of their predecessors (Arafat, et al).

Since the report does not give specifics of how the planes would be targeted or used, means this is not actionable intelligence, just a general warning to expect more of the same.

If this report is a smoking gun, then someone has been smoking controlled substances.


24 posted on 12/09/2005 11:58:07 AM PST by PsyOp (The commonwealth is theirs who hold the arms.... - Aristotle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson