WHY HILLARY MUST NOT WIN. WHY HILLARY CANNOT WIN.

12.10.05 | Mia T

[WhiteGuy]

If voting fraud pushes her over the top, she will have won. Republicans don't fight back.

IMHO if it is possible to commit vote fraud, it will happen.

Regardless of whether it is fake registration; voting in more than one place, casting votes for the dead, stealing ballots, ballot boxes or absentee ballots, causing computer voting machines to "miscount" or report incorrect totals, corruption, bribery, malfeasance, or simply manipulating the size, location, staffing levels, and number of machines available at polling locations, it will continue to happen as long as it is allowed to happen.

Both major parties will do whatever they must, to win.

For politicians, the ends always justify the means.

If people wish to be political activists, starting with the the way votes are cast and those responsible for counting the votes is the place to begin.

There is less than a year to go before the '06 election.

[Mia T]

The electorate is largely uniformed and disinformed and has the attention span of a two-year-old.

We can't go for subtleties here. In my view, the GOP candidate, post-9/11 and post-Katrina, would need the following: star power, a perceived strength in managing disasters, war and terror, a mental toughness, a proven record going after the bad guys, an ability to articulate (sorely missing today--the president has virtually ceded the bully pulpit to the Ds).

Put it all together and I think we have only one possibility....

[stephenjohnbanker]

Me too, and my daughter and brother!

[Mia T]

bump

[presently no screen name]

Miami Cubans, FReepers, Minutemen all banding together might save us


Right! And Mia is certainly doing her part to get the info out so we can spread it. What the liberals do for a lie, how much more we SHOULD do for the truth. It's not a time for us to live in our usual comfort zone.

[Mia T]

bump

[stephenjohnbanker]

"IMHO if it is possible to commit vote fraud, it will happen."

The Dems do it every year, with varying degrees of affectiveness. Expect massive voter fraud in the next election.

[Mia T]

thx bump

[FreeReign]

If people wish to be political activists, starting with the the way votes are cast and those responsible for counting the votes is the place to begin. There is less than a year to go before the '06 election.

Good advice. However in my view, the Clinton voter fraud schemes will be sitting out 2006.

The Clintons want a lot of Republicans in office for their 2008 run. They have a track record of using a Republican majority as a foil.

See 1994/1995/1996. Their slime machine stood-down in '94. Their slime machine went into action in '95. Clinton was reelected in '96.

[stephenjohnbanker]

Agreed!

[Dont_Tread_On_Me_888]

Here are a few: For Grassley, his own home page where he said:

"In September I wrote the president to request additional LIHEAP funds to address what is likely to be a shortage in funding assistance this winter season for thousands of households."

Source: http://grassley.senate.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=CapitolGains.Detail&CapitolGain_id=311&Year=2005

Also, Grassley said:

"Sen. Charles Grassley (news, bio, voting record), R-Iowa, said in a letter to API that the industry should devote part of its profits to a federal home heating assistance program. It was an ominous note since Grassley chairs the tax-writing Senate Finance Committee"

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ibd/20051210/bs_ibd_ibd/2005129general

Note: API = American Petroleum Institute

Bill Frist:

Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., said he would endorse a windfall tax on oil industry "if the facts warrant it"

Source: Same as above

"if the facts warrant it" . . . well, a lot of "facts" have warranted much other BS, like Frist's decision not to go nuclear over SCOTUS nominees.

If Frist were a true conservative and not a liberal, he would have rejected this Marxist view outright.

Santorum (from an op-ed he wrote at Townhall.com):

"Just as Katrina has seared American poverty into our moral consciousness, AIDS has seared Africa into our moral vision. Caring for the sick and dying in Africa now is morally right, as well as geopolitically prudent; if we don’t help, someone else will and that someone else may not be friendly to our interests. We need to embrace the challenge to dedicate a larger percentage of our GDP to foreign aid, . . ."

Source: http://www.townhall.com/opinion/columns/RickSantorum/2005/11/17/175882.html

[SVTCobra03]

"We can't go for subtleties here. In my view, the GOP candidate, post-9/11 and post-Katrina, would need the following: star power, a perceived strength in managing disasters, war and terror, a mental toughness, a proven record going after the bad guys, an ability to articulate (sorely missing today--the president has virtually ceded the bully pulpit to the Ds).

Put it all together and I think we have only one possibility"

Would his initials be RG?

[Theodore R.]

Isn't HRC's greatest asset that of "inevitability"? Most people expect her to win easily in 2008, and, therefore, she will unless she stumbles badly. I have always believed that much of her support comes from the lower classes who still believe that the alias "Bill" will be in charge in an HRC presidency.

[Theodore R.]

She grates on people, she reminds many men of their first wife,

Actually, I heard it once said that the first GHWB reminded women of their first husband: so that was why they were supposed to have been charmed by "second husband" Michael Stanley Dukakis. The analogy did not work in 1988.

[Theodore R.]

I wonder if the former Mrs. Lisa Foster ever understood what she was up against. I believe she has since remarried and tried to forget her association with the popular Clintons.

[Mia T]

 

Most people expect her to win easily in 2008

 

I assume you're speaking anecdotally.
Most people I know think she's a sure loser. ;)
(And so, btw, do Ickes, Geffen...
and Estrich before her alien pod transformation.)

 

Mia T, June 9, 1999

The only way they can win is to convince people that we're space aliens.

bill clinton

 

With thy sharp teeth this knot intrinsicate
Of life at once untie.

Antony and Cleopatra V, ii, 304-05

eggy Noonan's excellent piece in yesterday's Wall Street Journal is really the story of the death of democracy. At its core it is the description of the human double helix gone terribly awry, of a denatured protein grotesquely twisted, of two mutant, tangled strands of DNA, the basest imaginable of base pairs linked permanently, as firmly as guanine to cytosine, bill inexorably to hillary and conversely, doing what they do best, and doing it relentlessly.

Killing.
Killing insidiously.
Killing as they pose and pander and feel our pain.

My only complaint is with Peggy Noonan's title.
The Mad Boomer, doesn't begin to capture candidate clinton considered separately or even taken as the self-anointed "twofer," permanently conjoined at that cavity conspicuously empty except for ego, that place where brain and soul and guts and heart normally reside.

This is not to say that she -- that they -- are not both quite mad and of that self-indulgent, arrogantly, ignorantly solipsistic age sandwiched flatly between yesterday's innocence and tomorrow's insouciance. Rather, it is that their madness and their boomerism don't even begin to explain their noxious influence: The cloying, internally inconsistent clinton calculus. The unspoken clinton threats. They permeate the atmosphere like a coiling miasma, choking off all freedom.

Even in New York.
Especially in New York.
When she wrote "The New Colossus," Emma Lazarus hardly had in mind this pair of mutant, deadly, twisted aliens.

So forget Arkansas-Illinois carpetbaggery and standard issue muckraking. The clintons are aliens of quite another sort. They are extrinsic, not of this world. They are inhuman. They are dehumanizing.

You may recall that the first act of this story of two degenerates maintained by iterating idiots, farce of farce ad infinitum, was generated quite by accident by iterated AlGoreRhythm, who, it should be noted, is now himself the object of iterated calculation by said degenerates who want iteration 2004 all for themselves.

And thus the odd bit of bloody Gore in Act II: The ugly sight of a corrupt, bottom-heavy hillary self-impaled on the horns of a Treason-Dilemma- masquerading-as-a-Third-Term-Dilemma-masquerading-as-a-Senate-stampede, for example, or bill's recent unsolicited, underwhelming Times interview on the Gore candidacy.

Act I was called "The Cook, The Thief, His Wife and Her Lover." Ostensibly the tale of the wife of a bloodthirsty crime boss who finds romance with a bland bookseller between courses at her husband's restaurant, it was in fact the Thyestean and moveable -- yet unmoving -- feast of hillary clinton at her husband's sham restitution. (Note the reciprocity. The sham restitution in Act II is all hillary's.)

Food, color coding, sex, murder, torture and cannibalism were the exotic (if mostly horizontal) fare in this beautifully filmed but brutally uncompromising modern memoir which passed as ancient fable about nouveau riche rapacity.

Not for the faint at heart, Purple Hearts or queazy stomachs, this depiction of the gross debasement of America was heavily peppered with irony and dark humor throughout.

Although she baked no cookies, didn't do illicit land or cattle deals and stood by no man, hillary clinton starred in the triple role of the Cook, the Thief and his Wife. Her lover was played at once vaporously and in workmanlike fashion by the ghost of Eleanor Roosevelt, with Janet Reno, between her stints rendering intermittent injustice for the Husband, as the reliable stand-in. Sidney Blumenthal was the stand-in for the Cook and Craig Livingstone the stand-in for the Thief. The last-minute addition of Christopher Hitchens as the snitch was a stroke of absolute genius notwithstanding its cerebral accident, its predictable-if-perfect pitch and its facile alliteration.

Although Act I had no rating, the new clinton soccer-mom directive will require a photo ID for any viewer without independent proof of illegal alien DNC <-> DNA sequencing.

In Act II, rabid anti-clinton voters, roughly 33% of the U.S. populace according to as-yet-unpodded pollsters, become increasingly aware that they are disappearing in droves and being replaced by alien pod replicas which have their physical attributes but lack all anti-clinton affect.

If Act I was a thinly veiled allegory about naked clintonism, then Act II is a parable about the plan for world domination by the Establishment, aged hippies in pinstripes all, with their infantile, solipsistic world view amazingly untouched by time.

THE ALIENS

 

COPYRIGHT MIA T 1999, 2005

[Mia T]

I have always believed that much of her support comes from the lower classes who still believe that the alias "Bill" will be in charge in an HRC presidency.

I agree with those 'lower class' supporters. I think the husband would be in charge. (An upcoming thread: THE HILLARY PUPPET)

[Mia T]

ping

[quantim]

What about massive voter fraud?

Probably wouldn't have an impact because those states are already blue and would not change the electoral outcome.