[Fester Chugabrew]

What's more you're taking a presupposition shared BY all scientific theories (the uniformity of natural law) and saying it's a prediction OF a particular theory.

So? That makes the theory even more applicable, since it encompasses the practice of science itself.

[Stultis]

So? That makes the theory even more applicable, since it encompasses the practice of science itself.

It makes it non-applicable as science.

You realize there's a term for the claim that science is competent to analyze it's own grounds, or in general is philosophically omni-competent. This is called "scientism". You can endorse this if you wish, but you'll find yourself at odds with virtually all antievolutionists, and most mainstream scientists as well.