To: PatrickHenry
But E.O. Wilsons brave new world seems very different from visions of religion and morality-friendly Darwinian sugerplums dancing about in Krauthammers head. If in order for a theory to be correct, its proponents must march in lockstep in their beliefs and interpretations, I would invite the ID proponents to remove the beam from their own eye.
Shrug. These differences of opinion are chickenfeed compared to the differing interpretations of quantum mechanics.
6 posted on
12/12/2005 8:13:29 AM PST by
Physicist
To: Physicist
If in order for a theory to be correct, its proponents must march in lockstep in their beliefs and interpretations, I would invite the ID proponents to remove the beam from their own eye.Why do you choose religious terminology? That seems very hypcritical. Once again an evolutionist uses emotion and hypocrisy to make his point.
10 posted on
12/12/2005 8:18:07 AM PST by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Exalt the Lord our God, and worship at His footstool; He is holy. Ps 99:5)
To: Physicist
You're probably right. :)
To: Physicist; Aetius; Alamo-Girl; AndrewC; Asphalt; betty boop; bondserv; bvw; Cicero; D Rider; ...
"If in order for a theory to be correct, its proponents must march in lockstep in their beliefs and interpretations..." This does seem to be all that the evolution camp has left; they all hate the very idea of God with equal intensity, and have agreed to stiffle their differences in the name of preserving evolution's lifeless corpse.
309 posted on
12/12/2005 3:35:46 PM PST by
editor-surveyor
(Atheist and Fool are synonyms; Evolution is where fools hide from the sunrise)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson