To: abb
Did I miss something, or at no point did the article suggest their brain-dead lefty editorial policy might be just an itty-bitty problem??
To: bert; ForGod'sSake
>PING!<
The hits just keep on comin', fellas!
But the core-bigshots at Slime Inc, they're still in denial.
...bet? :o)
9 posted on
12/13/2005 3:15:07 PM PST by
Landru
(If a sucker's born every minute, that's a lotta suckers.)
To: Felis_irritable
You'll notice that Time's top two salesmen were fired. One could surmise that ad sales are sucking wind....
Speaking as a salesman myself, ain't nothing harder than trying to sell something that people ain't buying....
10 posted on
12/13/2005 3:15:46 PM PST by
abb
(Because News Reporting is too important to be left to the Journalists.)
To: Felis_irritable
Time Inc. said the new structure won't affect the editorial side of the businessLOL, of course. And the iceberg draws ever closer...
15 posted on
12/13/2005 3:22:40 PM PST by
Jhensy
To: Felis_irritable
I don't think you missed that...
it appears they've let go all the money folks,
who can't cash in the lies
19 posted on
12/13/2005 3:40:50 PM PST by
freema
(Proud Marine Mom-What fools they are who doubt the ability of liberty to triumph over despotism)
To: Felis_irritable
Did I miss something, or at no point did the article suggest their brain-dead lefty editorial policy might be just an itty-bitty problem??
You're so right! It would be more hurtful to them to let go of their ideology and liberal bias.
Here's a headline you'll never see from the liberal media:
The NY Times fires their liberal/unbalanced reporting and democratic party alliance.
23 posted on
12/13/2005 4:39:27 PM PST by
adorno
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson