[NormsRevenge]

there's always the potential that someone is going to write something nasty. It doesn't mean that we're perfect, of course, but the difference at Wikipedia is you have a community that's empowered to do something about it.

--

I guess this "writer" supports leaving loaded weapons in the crib with the baby and trusting the baby to not abuse the trust bestowed on it.

[no-s]

I guess this "writer" supports leaving loaded weapons in the crib with the baby and trusting the baby to not abuse the trust bestowed on it.

That's such a bogus criticism, it makes me wonder if you are a troll.

C'mon, wikiopedia is free and run by volunteers. All it can do is strive to improve the signal-to-noise ratio. If you don't like an article, you can always sign up and improve it. You get more than you pay for under the present scheme.

All of this media-directed criticism of Wikipedia is rather irrelevant. At least the directors of Wikipedia are interested in improving things, unlike the vanilla MSM.