Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Illegals bill drops felony provision
THE WASHINGTON TIMES ^ | December 15, 2005 | Stephen Dinan

Posted on 12/15/2005 6:03:42 AM PST by jackbenimble

The House Judiciary Committee chairman yesterday backed off his provision to make illegal aliens felons and instead proposed a misdemeanor charge for unlawful presence, angering some Republicans who wanted the higher penalty. The House is expected to vote today on a border enforcement and employee work verification bill, which calls for more U.S. Border Patrol agents, mandatory database checks of employees' eligibility to work, expanding expedited removal of illegal aliens and allowing sheriffs along the border to help enforce immigration law. Some Republicans already were threatening to try to block the bill if they didn't get a chance to vote on amendments such as ending birthright citizenship and allowing local authorities to aid federal immigration officials. Yesterday's change just fueled their determination. Initially the bill made felons out of the estimated 11 million illegal aliens, thus making them ineligible for legalization. But yesterday the bill's chief sponsor, Rep. F. James Sensenbrenner Jr., Wisconsin Republican and Judiciary Committee chairman, said he will amend the bill today to make it a misdemeanor. His spokesman, Jeff Lungren, said the felony requirement actually would have delayed deportation of those now here illegally, while the lesser charge speeds it up. "In order to get a conviction on a felony, you'd need a jury trial," he said. "A misdemeanor doesn't need a jury trial, but you can detain them while putting them through immigration proceedings." He said a misdemeanor still accomplishes their goal, which he said was to target those who overstay their temporary visas. Under current law, overstaying a visa is a civil offense but not a criminal offense, and if caught an alien can delay deportation for years by demanding a trial.

(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; Mexico
KEYWORDS: 109th; aliens; amnesty; cz; illegal; illegals; immigrantlist; immigration; immigrationreform
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
The bait and switch sham begins!
1 posted on 12/15/2005 6:03:43 AM PST by jackbenimble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jackbenimble

What they don't say is that I believe a felony prevents them from ever applying for citizenship or the "vaunted" work program.


2 posted on 12/15/2005 6:08:44 AM PST by Ingtar (Understanding is a three-edged sword : your side, my side, and the truth in between ." -- Kosh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jackbenimble

Don't be fooled by the lie that this is a "tough" immigration bill. Lou Dobbs spent some time discussing this sham that employers of illegals might as well have written themselves. Employers will have from TWO to SIX YEARS to investigate whether the Mexican they hire is here illegally or not. So this amounts to serial amnesty...the illegal will work for one employer six years, then go to another employer for another six years. Any Republican who votes for this pathetic attempt at back-door amnesty and cheap labor for the construction and service industy ought to be voted OUT in '06!


3 posted on 12/15/2005 6:11:15 AM PST by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jackbenimble

DAMN YOU, POTENTATES ON THE POTOMAC!!!


4 posted on 12/15/2005 6:12:47 AM PST by NRA1995 (Jesus is the reason for the season)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar
I believe it bars them from any sort of legal entry visa for at least 10 years. It was a very tough measure and now it is gone.

I did not expect it to survive the Senate/House Conference next spring but I want the House to go into that meeting with as tough a bargaining position as possible because they are almost surely going to come out of it with a shamnesty.

5 posted on 12/15/2005 6:12:49 AM PST by jackbenimble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jackbenimble

LULAC, MECHA, etc. AT IT AGAIN..."Now the government of Mexico is leading a lobbying effort against the border security measure. Mexican Foreign Relations Secretary Louis Derbez says his government is trying with great force to prevent the bill from passing. He is asking business, community and religious groups to make themselves heard. In Los Angeles illegal alien advocates answered his call with inflammatory rhetoric."

(Quote from Lou Dobb's CNN. Casey Wian.


6 posted on 12/15/2005 6:13:27 AM PST by television is just wrong (Our sympathies are misguided with illegal aliens...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: television is just wrong

What if it's true that a felony charge takes much longer to deport? Sounds good to me to keep it a misdemeanor IF---and only if---it's followed by serious deportation actions.


7 posted on 12/15/2005 6:19:59 AM PST by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole

ping


8 posted on 12/15/2005 6:21:02 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jackbenimble

Our Congress can always find was to burden the US Citizen with more and more of the burden of the world through Taxes and giving away our wealth, both in money and in blood, but now they show who and what they represent which is NOT the US Constitution and NOT the US Citizens.

The ILLEGAL aliens have no RIGHTS under the US Constitution as they are not US Citizens and therefore are here illegally. They have no right to a trial only immediate deportation out of the country at their HOME Country's expense.

They have no rights to any medical or educational benefits or housing.

Senator Kennedy in his infinite stupidity and willingness to give away our taxes wants to give the illegal aliens $2,500.00 of our taxes to help them get steeled in this country. I suggest we place a $2,500 bounty on every illegal alien that can be found and deported, along with stiff and heavy fines for companies who hire illegal aliens.


9 posted on 12/15/2005 6:21:03 AM PST by 26lemoncharlie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jackbenimble

Look for the final bill to be a watered-down do-nothing dipsy-doodle-shell-suffle hoodwinking bill.

GW will continue to push for amnesty (or continue to do nothing and let illegals still filter into the country).

Unless the first act is a mandatory wall (tall, metal or concrete, or armed border guards every 100 feet), all we will get is more of the same.


10 posted on 12/15/2005 6:21:34 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS

'Now the government of Mexico is leading a lobbying effort against the border security measure. Mexican Foreign Relations Secretary Louis Derbez says his government is trying with great force to prevent the bill from passing. He is asking business, community and religious groups to make themselves heard. In Los Angeles illegal alien advocates answered his call with inflammatory rhetoric.'

Quote from Lou Dobbs Cnn Casey Wian...


11 posted on 12/15/2005 6:22:10 AM PST by television is just wrong (Our sympathies are misguided with illegal aliens...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jackbenimble

In most countries illegal crossing of borders will get you shot. Misdemeanor charge is a joke and when will we enforce the existing employment laws.


12 posted on 12/15/2005 6:22:42 AM PST by Conspiracy Guy (I voted Republican because no Conservatives were running.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kittymyrib
Employers will have from TWO to SIX YEARS to investigate whether the Mexican they hire is here illegally or not.

I did not see that in my reading of the bill. The way I read it, employers have 6 years to check any employee currently on the payroll. New employees have to be checked immediately. This seems sensible. It does not give the illegals any legal status but it avoids a massive disruption to the economy. Any illegal who quits and tries to find a new job will be subject to verification and will have a tough time of it. Because of this they essentially become indentured to their current employers for the next 6 years and subject to whatever abuse the employer wants to inflict. Making them miserable is part of the process of encouraging them to self-deport.

13 posted on 12/15/2005 6:22:49 AM PST by jackbenimble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jackbenimble
backed off his provision to make illegal aliens felons and instead proposed a misdemeanor charge for unlawful presence

In other words, the law has been neutered so that instead of actually having some teeth, illegals just get the judicial equivalent of a speeding ticket and off they go like nothing ever happened.

14 posted on 12/15/2005 6:23:18 AM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity ("Sharpei diem - Seize the wrinkled dog.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jackbenimble

I wonder if the border agents they hire will join forces with the ones in the ranks already making extra $$$ for letting the trafficking gangs slip by them on their watch.

It happens.


15 posted on 12/15/2005 6:24:06 AM PST by Conservomax (There are no solutions, only trade-offs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kittymyrib
Politicians refuse to remove the illegals now.

What makes anyone with at least one functioning brain-cell think politicians will remove them in 6 years?

Politicians seem convinced that the American public are gullible.

[If we keep electing the same, then we are.]
16 posted on 12/15/2005 6:25:09 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: television is just wrong

Yah, but that isn't the issue. Sensenbrener is no fool, and he's no open borders guy. A felony DOES take a whole different judical track than a misdemeanor, and I could see this absolutely tying up courts like nothing we've ever seen if the ACLU and La Raza start fronting lawyers for these leapers.


17 posted on 12/15/2005 6:26:33 AM PST by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jackbenimble

Those of us paying attention expected the knife in the back.


18 posted on 12/15/2005 6:27:23 AM PST by the gillman@blacklagoon.com ("It's time for a f****** war, so join the army of hardcore")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jackbenimble
"A misdemeanor doesn't need a jury trial, but you can detain them while putting them through immigration proceedings." He said a misdemeanor still accomplishes their goal, which he said was to target those who overstay their temporary visas.

And in the absence of a felony conviction, they can still vote.

19 posted on 12/15/2005 6:27:50 AM PST by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jackbenimble
This is the beginning of the dance to screw the American people, again. First the cheap tough talk in the House, but with enforcement actions not making the House bill, then come the Senate who will also talk tough but put in the "Guest worker" program in their bill. Then will come the conference bill which will have little in enforcement or enforcement funds AND a guest worker program.

Also, I thought the present H1B and H2B programs are "guest worker programs".

I feel another screwing coming by BOTH parties.
20 posted on 12/15/2005 6:30:56 AM PST by jackieaxe (English speaking, law abiding, taxpaying citizen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson