Posted on 12/15/2005 3:52:26 PM PST by conservative in nyc
More at the link.
MD4Bush Ping!
Unlawful Access to Stored Communications 18 U.S.C. 2701.
"§ 2701. Unlawful Access to Stored Communications
(a) Offense.--Except as provided in subsection (c) of this section whoever–
(1) intentionally accesses without authorization a facility through which an electronic communication service is provided; or
(2) intentionally exceeds an authorization to access that facility; and thereby obtains, alters, or prevents authorized access to a wire or electronic communication while it is in electronic storage in such system shall be punished as provided in subsection (b) of this section. "
Registration and User Agreement
"User Account Confidentiality: User agrees to protect user's account and password and not to disclose account information to any third party."
The WP did exceed an authorization to access FR by using anothers password(Forbidden under the Users Agreement which govern the access of users) to access FRmails and did not make any attempt to determine the rules of access to FR or presumably they would not have improperly used anothers password. They flat did violate section 2b of 18 U.S.C. 2701 in that they did not view, or observe the rules if they did view them. If the reporter was unaware of 2b of 18 U.S.C. 2701 it won't help. A professional at a large newspaper should know or should have asked.
Are you a lawyer, or do you just play one on the internet?
If you reach in a haystack and pull out a needle...What are the odds the haystack is loaded with needles?
No, I looked up the law on a previous thread. I doubt if anything is done on this angle, but a federal prosecution would circumvent MD legislature footdragging and six covering.
Interesting what a search of Bugmenot turns up for FR usernames & passwords.
It would be delicious if Jim Robinson could win a lawsuit against the vile Washington Post. Delicious, and just.
In his posting Thursday, Robinson claimed MD4Bush breached the agreement with Free Republic, arguing that MD4Bush targeted Steffen from the start by directing the very first MD4Bush posting to Steffen.
He accused MD4Bush of planting false rumors on the Web site, an apparent reference to the new dirt MD4Bush added to the O'Malley rumor story.
Jim Robinson is right. Furthermore, Steffan did not play to those rumors; but rather attempted to pan them away, and down. Steffan wasn't playing. Nontheless, the mere FACT that a bear-trap had been laid for Steffan (and ultimately for Gov Erhlich), the trap came in PROXIMITY to Steffan was sufficient for the Democrats and WaPO to assert that Steffan was "guilty" of rumormongering.
egads.. I've just outlined the classic "girl fight" script. And to think, it was schemed by the Democrats -- a girlish sort of "game". Yech!
Ah, the very thought of the comPost having to pay JR.......delicious!!!!
That would, but it would take a fortune to sue the WP. I was thinking more along the line of a criminal prosecution. I doubt if the feds would take an interest, but by my reading
there appears to have been a violation of law.
Interesting, isn't it? Some of those shared accounts appear to be active (.e.not "banned/suspended).
Account #24
???????????????????
Thanks!
bttt
Remember, some of those shared accounts might not really be shared. Like Number 24. All it takes is one vindictive idiot to cast doubt about your good FReeper name.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.